Scientific vs. Religious Views on a baby is a good ethically?
Introduction
Cloning is ethically and with honesty is wrong. The subject trembles us all to our very essences. For humans to think the cloning of one another vigor's them all to inquiry the very conceptions of right and wrong that make them all human.
Ellen Goodman: We call these people scientists; they try to make new discoveries and take a scientific look at something and better it. A baby is an organism resulting asexually from a single creature by cutting, fission, bulbs, tubers, nuclear transfer, or parthenogenesis reproduction. Many people say it is the future; (Vukadinovich & Krinsky, 2001) that will enable us to know what we are getting before we get it, as I'll refer to it as the "pre-packaged" deal of a lifetime.
Alex Kuczynski: Life as we know it will never be the same after the official birth of the first human being. Imagine if you will all the things that can be accomplished, with a little nucleus replacement and skin. A mother whose child is so drastically taken away from her, with just the strands from the dead child can be fertiled. A man in badly need of a heart transplant can be given a new, and healthy heart just like that. A widow, of a man who has lost his wife due to the battle of breast cancer can no longer despair due to technology.
Joy William: yes! Of course as we as a society refer to it as the "gift of life” procreation with benefits can become established. But, with all these wonderful achievements that can be accomplished there is a downside. Dolly was the only one to survive. If those nuclei were human being, the ...