I would like to take this chance for thanking my research facilitator, friends & family for support they provided & their belief in me as Vestasll as guidance they provided without which I would have never been able to do this research (Elman, 1).
DECLARATION
I, (Your name), would like to declare that all contents included in this thesis/dissertation stand for my individual work without any aid, & this thesis/dissertation has not been submitted for any examination at academic as Vestasll as professional level previously. It is also representing my very own views & not essentially which are associated with university (Elman, 1).
Signature:
Date:
Abstract
The scholars of the international relations have developed several theories in order to describe the existence and evolution of international conflicts. One major theory that has been presented by these scholars is the democratic peace theory that argues that the democratic states are less probable to involve in conflict with one another. This thesis is an attempt to analyze that why the democratic peace theory is problematic. For this purpose, the conflict of Israel and Palestine has been considered as the main example (Gelpi, 1918).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTII
DECLARATIONIII
ABSTRACTIV
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION1
Background1
Problem Statement3
Research Aims and Objectives3
Research Questions3
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW5
Democratic Peace Theory5
Structural Explanation of Democratic Peace Theory11
Normative Explanation of Democratic Peace Theory12
Monadic Explanation of Democratic Peace Theory13
Dyadic Explanation of Democratic Peace Theory14
Wider Implications of Democratic Peace Theory15
Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Democratic Peace Theory16
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY18
Research Design18
Secondary Research19
Advantages of Secondary Research19
Research Method20
Qualitative research21
Philosophy for the Research21
Literature search22
Method for Data Analysis23
Validity23
Ethical consideration24
CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION26
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION33
REFERENCESERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Background
Today, the democratic peace theory has become very common. This thesis has pointed out the very fundamental aspects of the democratic peace theory and the focus, as the thesis has suspected that the strong aspects of the democratic peace theory are already well known. The focus of this research has been on its biggest challenges and problems. The democratic peace theory state that democratic states do not fight with one another, they often fight with non-democratic states, but they never fight with each other. The supporters of the democratic peace theory consider that history explains us that this theory is true. In some cases, the democracies endangered force to each other (Ikhenberry, 2011). There are four major explanations for the democratic peace theory. The first main explanation is that; few scholars argue that democratic states inherit rules of peaceful resolution of conflict that they also show in their external relations. The second explanation is that the democratic settings such as the powerful government and competitive voting make illegal for the executive to go for war. The third explanation is that, some scholars argue that the democratic states trade a lot with each other and that therefore war would be just costs, however no gains. The fourth explanation is that one can argue that democratic states are commonly liberal nations, and that liberalism generates all the above-mentioned outcomes (Hall, 2012) (Gelpi, 1918).