The Beauty Myth

This paper talks about the note in Naomi Wolf's publication, "The attractiveness Myth", interpreting that Wolf places ahead the challenging argument that the perfect of beauty in up to date heritage is nothing but the latest method of holding women in a subservient role inside the patriarchy. She sees the ubiquitous images of feminine beauty that pervade our culture as being part of a vicious backlash against the achievements of feminism, contending that this attractiveness myth functions to hold women assured that they are worth less than men, and thus maintains the present economic system (Fallon, 89).

Beauty” is not universal, or changeless, though the West pretends that all ideals of feminine attractiveness stem from one Platonic perfect Woman; The Maori adore a fat vulva, and the Padung, droopy breasts. neither is “beauty” a function of evolution: its ideals change at a stride far more fast than that of the evolution of the species, and Charles Darwin himself was unconvinced by his own interpretation that “beauty” resulted from a sexual assortment that deviated from the rule of natural selection; for women to compete with women through “beauty” is a reversal of the way in which natural selection affects all other mammals (Naomi Wolf, 55).

Define a beautiful woman. Think about that delineation for a moment. What adjectives are utilized in the description? Are phrases like powerful, joyous, content, good friend, someone to believe, or hard working used? Are the inward features of a woman the ones used to characterize beauty? Or are phrases like slim, good skeletal part structure, hitting face, glowing hair, full lips, or pert breasts used in the definition?

All our inhabits we have perceived the adages "Beauty is only skin deep" or "Beauty is as beauty does" or that it is the inward individual that defines us ...