Terrorism Influences



Terrorism Influences

Introduction

On a historical basis, the word terrorism refers to the political regime during the French Revolution. Its use was transformed during the nineteenth century to describe political violence (bombings, asymmetric conflict, political assassinations, etc). It was frequently used by journalists and researchers, the concept was criticized by researchers, in general or in specific cases, the term was considered as subjective and for removing their legitimacy and political aspect to groups or acts on which it was applied. The multiple definitions varied on the use of violence including some groups that do not use violence but with a radical discourse, the technology used, the targets (military or civilian), the nature of the subject (setting aside state terrorism), the use of fear, the level of organization, ideology, etc. Thus, the bombing of Hiroshima, Dresden, USSR, Zealots, Tupamaros, the PFLP, Fatah or Al Qaeda may fall within the definition of terrorism. Therefore, all the issues related to terrorism influences will be discussed in detail.

Discussion

The word terrorism was attested for the first time in November 1794. It then designated the doctrine of the supporters of terror, those who, some time before, had exercised the power by conducting an intense struggle and violent against counter-revolutionaries. This is called a mode of exercising power, not a means of action against him. The word had evolved during the nineteenth century to describe either a state action but an action against him. Its use was documented in a sense for anti-government in 1866 for Ireland, in 1883 for Russia (nihilist movement), in British India (Jugantar), the Balkans and the Ottoman Empire (the Macedonian Revolutionary Organization, IMRO, which had a practice of hostage-taking of Europeans, and Armenian, which provided the material for a book, or the terrorism in the Balkans, to Albert Londres. Terrorism in the modern sense is born with the modern media. This one, in its modern form, is spreading in the Middle East, with the assassination of Nasir al-Din Shah in 1896, whose moral responsibility is often attributed, wrongly or rightly, to Jamal Al-Din Al- Afghani. He acquired a pejorative connotation and now refers to violent actions intended to spread terror and build pressure on a State. They often target civilians, to destroy and kill them. These attacks are designed to promote messages for ideological, political or religious thoughts out of fear and the media publicity (Altheide, 2006, 121).

The term terrorism is now frequently used in international law and by international institutions, but it does not give rise to a single and universal definition. Some elements have reached consensus and the philosopher Jacques Derrida writes, "If we refer to common definitions of terrorism or explicitly legal, what do we find? The reference to a crime against human life in violation of laws will involve both the distinction between civilian, and a political purpose influence or change policy a country by terrorizing its civilian population. As part of a conventional war, there is indeed a clear legal framework, the law of ...