Tech and Human Behavior

Tech and Human Behavior

Introduction

The media revolution is not accepted by everyone in the modern times. There are various approaches to address the impact of mass media on society that are defined by critically evaluating the negative consequences. Neil Postman is widely recognized as one of those individuals who are defining the fact that technology is not always helpful in fulfilling the human needs that are generated with a rather undefined attitude. He was one of the most open contenders of mass media for what he provided a number of views and philosophical evidences that are contemporary ideas within the modern era.

Discussion

Postman starts his book by testing the thought that engineering is basically our companion, upholding sound measurements of suspicion regarding tolerating either new or old advances. He plots how innovations are not impartial, but instead, instilled with an inclined elucidation of actuality. For instance, the utilization of PCs expedites the development of independence, egocentrism, and the development of individualized space. Postman's section is defined as obvious, enough discernable, and responsive; it is not quick; however doesn't markdown his fill at the place of stale along with superficial. Shockingly, his work is completely genuine, clear, and fitting, couched in a dazzling essayistic or correspondent genre. Disregarding the way that his books are extensively scattered and quickly receptive, his dismemberments and responses are explained (Ross, 2009).

Postman is not hostile to innovation, a focus he himself is mindful so as to make and that bears attention and emphasis. How he or anybody could be against innovation, he himself promptly affirms. In completing along these lines, TV changes even the most essential things life and expiration, for instance into unimportant trifles and trivia. TV drastically changes how we observe things just through pictures and how we consider things we don't. Television changes us into latent beneficiaries of pictures. It requests nothing of us yet our submission (Postman, 2004).

Postman's contention next to a fashionable engineering or development can or should respite on the straightforward being obviously yet clearly not so evident disclosure that the utilization along communication with innovation influences us and our planet. Our advances (power, car, phone, TV, and the Pc) shape the modalities of our existence. The creators' major fizzling, in any case, is the nonappearance of a point of view on engineering's past that maybe might determine just from a more supported investigation of that history. For all their modernity, none of these completely likes the exceptional degree to which innovation in each time and spot is more the result of social and other non-innovative drives than it is the power supposedly forming any given society. It is unchangingly simpler to interpret innovation's control over society than it is to infer what non-innovative powers permitted this to happen.

The homogenizing process that began with synchronous guideline was extraordinarily helped by course readings, for they confined the sort of substance and the measure that was taught in a scholastic year, and guaranteed that year after year the same indistinguishable information ...