Supreme Court and Public Administration



Supreme Court and Public Administration

Introduction

The paper intends to define the role of Supreme Court in a comprehensive way and how it is used in the Public Administration. The study will also expound the implications of administrative theory in the everyday lives of people. Hence, in short, the paper will deal with the theoretical as well as practical framework of public administration in detail. The paper also attempts to describe the public administrators play the integral role saving the life of the entire humanity.

The Supreme Court is recognized as the most significant court all over the United States. It is considered as the America's highest court which is located in Washington, D.C. On March 4, 1789, the most critical task which the business required to do was to deal with the requirements of Article111, Section 1, of the Constitution. However, according to the Article 3, section 1, that the judicial power of the United States required to be vested in Supreme Court, wherein the Congress can ordain and establish time to time. In this concern, the First Congress initiated the act of establishing the thirteen courts in the prime locations of the country which included the important cities on the basis of the response of Judiciary Act of 1789. These courts included the three circuit courts, and one Supreme Court which involves the Chief Justice and the Associate Justices. The research indicates that there have been 112 justices on the Supreme Court that comprised of the seventeen Chief Justices. Hence, the constitutional laws is considered as the main source of the existing legal approach to public administration (Shafritz and Hyde, 2012, pg.447). Hence, Shafritz and Hyde state that the Federal Judiciary was the fundamental source which actually re-established the rights, roles, procedural and equal protection rights for the liberty of citizenry with regard to public administrators. The Federal Judiciary has been involved in this process since 1950s (Shafritz and Hyde, 2012). According to Shafritz and Hyde, concomitantly, there was administrators afford constitutional procedural due process to the individuals upon whom they specifically acted (Shafritz and Hyde, 2012). A statement made by Shafritz and Hyde is a new stringency was read into the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, which were entirely the new rights, that were specifically developed for the public mental health facilities. These rights included the rights of treatment and habilitation that were ratified by the Supreme Court (Shafritz and Hyde, 2012). In addition to it, the right to equal protection was basically considered as the administrative matter which covers the public personnel merit examinations to the operational of public schools and prisons (Shafritz and Hyde, 2012).

Discussion

The Supreme Court of US evolves in resolving the constitutional disputes, political matters that are highly contentious, and bill of rights issues. Hence, the Supreme Court has the active collaboration with the public administration as it is concerned with the wellbeing of the society (Bazelon, 1976). The public administration can be defined as the implementation of the ...