It is commonly perceived that few races are indulged in criminal activities, more than the other. This research is aimed to find out whether racial background has anything to do with the criminal activities and records or not.
Hypothesis
H0-1 = the average total prior arrest is same throughout all the races
H0-2 = the average total prior convictions is same throughout all the races
H0-3 = the average sex of defendant is same throughout all the races
H0-4 = the average adjudication outcome is same throughout all the races
Result statistic notation and interpretation
Descriptive
Prior Arrest
Prior Conviction
Sex
Adjudication Outcome
Mean
10.1
3.34
0.86
1.38
SD
14.464
5.09
0.347
0.486
df
448
438
456
336
f statistics
1.472
0.665
0.338
1.69
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum
Maximum
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
# TOTAL PRIOR ARRESTS
White
149
8.99
13.037
1.068
6.88
11.10
0
89
Black
299
10.75
15.148
.876
9.03
12.47
0
89
Asian, Pacific Islander
3
.00
.000
.000
.00
.00
0
0
Total
451
10.10
14.464
.681
8.76
11.44
0
89
# TOTAL PRIOR CONVICTIONS
White
146
3.29
5.674
.470
2.37
4.22
0
39
Black
292
3.39
4.797
.281
2.84
3.94
0
24
Asian, Pacific Islander
3
.00
.000
.000
.00
.00
0
0
Total
441
3.34
5.090
.242
2.86
3.81
0
39
SEX OF DEFENDANT
White
153
.85
.359
.029
.79
.91
0
1
Black
303
.86
.343
.020
.83
.90
0
1
Asian, Pacific Islander
3
1.00
.000
.000
1.00
1.00
1
1
Total
459
.86
.347
.016
.83
.89
0
1
ADJUDICATION OUTCOME
White
115
1.37
.484
.045
1.28
1.45
1
2
Black
222
1.38
.487
.033
1.32
1.45
1
2
Asian, Pacific Islander
2
2.00
.000
.000
2.00
2.00
2
2
Total
339
1.38
.486
.026
1.33
1.43
1
2
Mean of any variable, signifies, the average results or the average attribute of that variable or the categories mentioned within that variable. Looking at the results above, we can infer that the total number of prior arrest, on an average amongst the white people is almost 9. Likewise, we can see that number of prior arrest, on an average amongst the black people is almost 11. While looking at the results of the Asian and the Pacific Islander is 0. So it is quite possible that if any of the arrests are made for the whites and the black, it would be of those people, who had been arrested for something before as well. However if we conduct further analysis of the result, we could also say that the higher figures of S D , both for whites and blacks elaborates that their averages are being influenced by few representative who have higher figures of prior arrests.
If we look at the gender of the sample population, the mean value of 0.88, 0.87 and 1 respectively tells us that most of the them belong to the male category and therefore we can infer that the reported crime rate prevails more in the males and not the females.
ANOVA
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
# TOTAL PRIOR ARRESTS
Between Groups
614.527
2
307.263
1.472
.231
Within Groups
93533.181
448
208.779
Total
94147.707
450
# TOTAL PRIOR CONVICTIONS
Between Groups
34.502
2
17.251
.665
.515
Within Groups
11363.829
438
25.945
Total
11398.331
440
SEX OF DEFENDANT
Between Groups
.082
2
.041
.338
.713
Within Groups
54.995
456
.121
Total
55.076
458
ADJUDICATION OUTCOME
Between Groups
.796
2
.398
1.690
.186
Within Groups
79.116
336
.235
Total
79.912
338
ANOVA elaborates, whether the mean or the average of the more than two groups is significantly different from each other or not. In our case, we have tested the average results of the three groups on the basis of race of the criminal, in all the variables, in order to see, whether there average results are same or different between the groups. The null hypothesis for our test can also be stated as
H0 = the average results of the groups are equal to each other.
As we can see in the table above, the null hypotheses for all the variables are being accepted, this means that the averages of all the groups are equal, in the above mentioned criteria, which are total prior arrests, total prior convictions, sex of defendant and adjudication outcome