Unbiased point estimate for customer wait times per visit
Table 1
Statistics
Wait time
N
Valid
50
Missing
0
Mean
22.9000
The point estimator for customer wait times per visit is “22.9”.
Sample standard deviation of customer wait times per visit
Table 2
Statistics
Wait time
N
Valid
50
Missing
0
Std. Deviation
13.60110
The standard deviation for customer wait time per visit is “13.6”.
95% confidence interval for the true mean
Table 3
Descriptives
Statistic
Std. Error
Wait time
Mean
22.9000
1.92349
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Lower Bound
19.0346
Upper Bound
26.7654
5% Trimmed Mean
22.9000
Median
21.0000
Variance
184.990
Std. Deviation
13.60110
Minimum
1.00
Maximum
46.00
Range
45.00
Interquartile Range
25.00
Skewness
.097
.337
Kurtosis
-1.332
.662
The estimated confidence interval is 19.03 (upper bound) and 26.76 (upper bound).
Assumptions made from part c
The assumption made from part c is that the predicted waiting time for customer lies between 19.03 and 26.76 but if the waiting time is increased, the customer may not visit or become default.
Conclusion drawn from part c
The confidence interval level shows that the waiting time of customer per visit will fall between 19.03 and 26.76.
Precision in estimation and change in confidence interval by increasing sample size
Table 4
Descriptives
Statistic
Std. Error
waittime
Mean
22.9000
1.35322
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Lower Bound
20.2149
Upper Bound
25.5851
5% Trimmed Mean
22.9000
Median
21.0000
Variance
183.121
Std. Deviation
13.53223
Minimum
1.00
Maximum
46.00
Range
45.00
Interquartile Range
25.00
Skewness
.095
.241
Kurtosis
-1.326
.478
Question #2: Calculations for Improvement in table management
Null and Alternative hypotheses
H0: The improvement in table management is insignificant to reduced wait times, increased customer satisfaction, and dinner service table turnover.
H1: The improvement in table management is significant to reduced wait times, increased customer satisfaction, and dinner service table turnover.
The critical value
The critical value calculated is 1.976. It is calculated through excel. The tabulated value is 1.644. However, the formula for calculation t-value is:
The value of the test statistic
The test statistics measures all the F value, t values, and z values of the test. Following are techniques used for test statistics;
The population standard deviation for the sample is 8 and standard deviation is 11.
Variance of population= 8 squared =56
Variance of sample= 11 squared = 113
Thus f value= 113/ 56
F value calculated = 2.017
F value tabulated = 1.000
Conclusion and interpretation of the hypothesis test
The value of f calculated > f tabulated, so reject H0 and accept HI. The value of t calculated > t tabulated, so reject H0 and accept HI. It shows that there is significant relationship between customer satisfaction and reduced wait times, increased customer satisfaction, and dinner service table turnover.
Question # 3: Calculations of the satisfaction data
Exclusion of independent variables from the correlation matrix
Table 5
The above correlation matrix shows that out of five independent variables, there are two independent variables that must be removed from the model to make more significant results. These two independent variables are; vegetarian and price per cover. These two independent variables are suggested to be removed because these two variables share negative correlation with the customer satisfaction that shows a weak and negative relationship
Significant contribution of five explanatory variables to the regression model
Table 6
The multiple regression model shows that the overall explanatory power of the model is 98.6% and R square is the coefficient of determination that shows the explained variation. This model explains 97.2% explained variation and remaining is unexplained variation.
The null hypothesis is;
H0: There is an insignificant relationship between dependent variable and independent ...