Relationship between level of freedom and economic growth
Correlations
GDP per capita ppp 2006 (World bank 2007)
Freedom House category of democracy 2007
GDP per capita ppp 2006 (World bank 2007)
Pearson Correlation
1
-.372**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
2.208E10
-606833.200
Covariance
1.162E8
-3210.758
N
191
190
Freedom House category of democracy 2007
Pearson Correlation
-.372**
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
Sum of Squares and Cross-products
-606833.200
120.863
Covariance
-3210.758
.639
N
190
190
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
The above table reflects a negative association between the level of freedom and economic growth of the country. The Pearson correlation is -.372 that reflects a negative correlation. It means if the level of freedom will increase by 1%, the economic growth will decrease by 1%. Hence, it is interpreted that is a weak and negative relationship between the two variables.
Relationship of HDI
Relation between human development index and nature and quality institutions
Correlations
Human development index 2005 100-pt scale (UNDP 2007)
Kaufmann political stability 2005
Kaufmann government effectiveness 2005
Kaufmann rule of law 2005
Kaufmann corruption 2005
Economic globalization 2005 (KOF 2008)
Political globalization 2005 (KOF 2008)
Previous British colony/not (from CIA Factbook)
Pearson Correlation
Human development index 2005 100-pt scale (UNDP 2007)
1.000
.646
.829
.784
.777
.784
.295
-.071
Kaufmann political stability 2005
.646
1.000
.824
.842
.805
.661
.035
.002
Kaufmann government effectiveness 2005
.829
.824
1.000
.972
.965
.784
.272
.055
Kaufmann rule of law 2005
.784
.842
.972
1.000
.974
.731
.230
.100
Kaufmann corruption 2005
.777
.805
.965
.974
1.000
.735
.212
.048
Economic globalization 2005 (KOF 2008)
.784
.661
.784
.731
.735
1.000
.165
-.023
Political globalization 2005 (KOF 2008)
.295
.035
.272
.230
.212
.165
1.000
-.144
Previous British colony/not (from CIA Factbook)
-.071
.002
.055
.100
.048
-.023
-.144
1.000
Sig. (1-tailed)
Human development index 2005 100-pt scale (UNDP 2007)
.
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.001
.225
Kaufmann political stability 2005
.000
.
.000
.000
.000
.000
.355
.493
Kaufmann government effectiveness 2005
.000
.000
.
.000
.000
.000
.002
.280
Kaufmann rule of law 2005
.000
.000
.000
.
.000
.000
.007
.144
Kaufmann corruption 2005
.000
.000
.000
.000
.
.000
.012
.305
Economic globalization 2005 (KOF 2008)
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.
.040
.405
Political globalization 2005 (KOF 2008)
.001
.355
.002
.007
.012
.040
.
.063
Previous British colony/not (from CIA Factbook)
.225
.493
.280
.144
.305
.405
.063
.
N
Human development index 2005 100-pt scale (UNDP 2007)
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
Kaufmann political stability 2005
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
Kaufmann government effectiveness 2005
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
Kaufmann rule of law 2005
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
Kaufmann corruption 2005
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
Economic globalization 2005 (KOF 2008)
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
Political globalization 2005 (KOF 2008)
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
Previous British colony/not (from CIA Factbook)
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
The above table shows that association between variables is positive and strong relationship except “British colonization”. British colonization is negatively associated with the human development index.
All the independent variables are significant as significance value is less than 0.05, whereas, the significance value of British colonization is greater than a. It means British colonization is an insignificant independent variable.
Model Summary
Model
R
R Square
Adjusted R Square
Std. Error of the Estimate
1
.869a
.756
.740
.091924
a. Predictors: (Constant), Previous British colony/not (from CIA Factbook), Kaufmann political stability 2005, Political globalization 2005 (KOF 2008), Economic globalization 2005 (KOF 2008), Kaufmann corruption 2005, Kaufmann government effectiveness 2005, Kaufmann rule of law 2005
The table of model summary indicates the explanatory power of the model. R value tells the absolute value correlation. The correlation among all the variables is 0.869. R square is the coefficient of determination. R square is 0.756, which means that 75.6% of the variation is explained through this model, and remaining is unexplained variation.
Relation between human development index and level of freedom
Correlations
Human development index 2005 100-pt scale (UNDP 2007)
Religious Freedom index (20 pt scale) (Norris and Inglehart WVS)
Mean political rights score 1980-2008
Mean civil liberties score 1980-2008
Empowerment Rights Index (CIRI)
Pearson Correlation
Human development index 2005 100-pt scale (UNDP 2007)
1.000
-.143
-.598
-.593
.314
Religious Freedom index (20 pt scale) (Norris and Inglehart WVS)
-.143
1.000
-.320
-.348
.515
Mean political rights score 1980-2008
-.598
-.320
1.000
.980
-.718
Mean civil liberties score 1980-2008
-.593
-.348
.980
1.000
-.728
Empowerment Rights Index (CIRI)
.314
.515
-.718
-.728
1.000
Sig. (1-tailed)
Human development index 2005 100-pt scale (UNDP 2007)
.
.044
.000
.000
.000
Religious Freedom index (20 pt scale) (Norris and Inglehart WVS)