SOCIOLOGY- A BRIEF INTRODUCTION

Sociology- A Brief Introduction

Chapter 1

Obviously there are various ways in which a nomi (a marked, sometime constructed, norm or reality) can be exposed. Which pattern of the comparative method should one use however? The response, whichever one concerns to the 'truth' in question. For example, you absolutely would not do a cross-gender form of evaluation if you wished to expose if or not homosexuality has always been dreaded and looked down upon by most people all through history. No, rather you would present a chronicled evaluation of two or more different societies to see if these convictions always lived, or, if or not this is a freshly assembled belief.

Cross-class evaluations is also a evaluation routinely utilised when attempting to reveal constructed realities between two classes. i.e. lower-class, upper-class, middle-class. For an demonstration I refer to my address notes. Our lecturer provided us a fine demonstration of a cross-class evaluation engaging his own life. He was from a middle-class family and came to a public school where he got engaged with diverse children from the middle and lower class. He increased up in this type of natural natural natural environment and accepted it as the his life as the way humanity was. To him, there was not another lifestyle. This was life. Several events occurred and because of these events our professor was moved, by his parents, to a personal school.

Chapter 3

Let's look at little more nearly at the overhead mentioned historical comparison and see how the relative method works with a exact example. There is no inquiry that in today's western society there is a lot of fear and trepidation towards people who are marked 'homosexual'. The question we will attempt to answer although is whether or not it has always been like this and is this a universal truth. In very old Greek societies persons had a very different opinion of men that slept with men. For demonstration, it was advised quite an honor for a family with a young young man under the age of 10, to be given the privilege on an older man of high humanity taking their child into his house. It was not until then that the young man was advised a man. Society considered that an older mans, of large status, semen would help the young man develop into a fine young man. Once the young man evolved the facial hair, the sex between the two would stop. The older man's job was finished. Obviously this would be considered an atrocious and appalling proceed these days. The older man in this case would absolutely go to prison for the 'crimes' that he had committed. although, in Ancient Greece this was not only considered perfectly usual, but as I currently stated, it was an honor and a gift that not every young man was 'lucky' sufficient to be given. Therefore, we can resolve from this comparison thead covering homophobia, as we understand it, is not a natural truth, ...