SHOULD COLLEGE ATHLETES BE PAID?

Should College Athletes Be Paid?

Should College Athletes Be Paid?

Introduction

Whether or not college athletes should be paid for their services is a great and heated debate across the country. Opponents argue that college athletes a scholarship to pay for higher education should be adequate compensation. Unlike those who support this proposal, noting the millions of dollars of revenue generated by football and basketball only justification for questioning the conservation of this income exclusively from those who are primarily responsible for generating them. In the end, from this perspective, the benefits accrued through television rights, ball games, ticket sales and various other sources that would not exist without the efforts of athletes (Berri 2006).

Analysis and Discussion

Several issues are involved in a heated debate whether student athletes should exercise their bodies to pay for their services. Some people think that the students through their own athletes get enough compensation to get more scholarships. Some people believe that students should strive for the athletes and their revenue to their universities reward. In order to further the debate, supporters of the review and will be student athletes from the university to pay the opponent, made some comments to help readers gain a better understanding. Student athletes have always been taken against the outside employment, though the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) scholarship athletes have recently begun to allow part-time work during the school year, but the fact remains that the majority of college athletes have severe restrictions on their college career win potential. Recently, after many debates, the NCAA issued a Proposition 62, which gave the right to work of college athletes. The amendment allows the player to earn up to $ 1,500 a year. It is actually scheduled to take effect a few years ago, but due to endless review and evaluation, the proposal significantly (Rosner 2004).

The current restrictions prevent receiving any compensation for their athletic ability, because it is the kind of competition they qualify at the collegiate level athletes. In basketball, for example, in the drafting of the NBA players automatically produce collegiate eligibility if they have played by their ability to pay, regardless of how widely the station. Can imagine, this might prevent those who are trying to play professional and did not succeed, never to return to school. Some people also worry that compensation will further reduce the student athletes' graduation rates of athletes (Lewis 1970).

For the payment of college athletes around the issue is controversial in part because critics of the Declaration, although students do college athletes generate substantial revenues, they also bring millions of dollars in spending, most of which directly or indirectly benefit student athletes . These costs include travel to the homes to equipment buying, medical care; however, there is no such costs will not do this if the athletes for the college-specific services. Therefore, the argument that all "evens out" in the end can be said that the cost of non-profits as a whole is only part of the cycle, in ...