Rise of Rome

What processes led to the rise of Rome

What processes led to the rise of Rome.

Introduction

In 133 BC, the leader of an unaligned state in centered Asia Minor (Turkey), one Pergamum, died. When his will was read, he had left his homeland to Rome. This somewhat bizarre wish - which was duly conveyed out - served as a springboard for the subsequent Roman occupation of the rest of Asia Minor and the Near East.(Donald, 2002) The time span from 133 BC to 30 BC is renowned as the late Republic, throughout which Rome itself was to know-how municipal strife not seen since the days of the Latini insurrection against the Etruscans. In supplement to this, Rome also committed in several foreign wars.

 

Slaves - The Seeds of Rome's Decline

From the very earliest times the Romans had also been trading slaves into their homeland - a principle which was to augment into a foremost financial undertaking in Rome itself - but also finally to lead to Rome being topped up with all kind of persons who unexciting no resemblance to the Romans themselves. Slaves from the Far East, Africa and the Semitic speaking world topped up the slave houses of Rome in their hundreds of thousands.(Hunt, 2001)

 

Civil War - Strife between Patricians and Plebians

Internally, Rome had become increasingly split up between the patricians and the plebeians; especially with consider landing distribution. Some patricians recognized the require for restructure, the most famous being Tiberius Gracchus, who was voted into agency to the post of tribune (a up to date matching would be a major minister) in 133 BC. The reforms Gracchus applied acquired him the abhorrence of the rich classes, and in 134 BC, he was assassinated.(Hunt, 2001)

His work was although taken up by his male sibling, Gaius Gracchus, who was voted into agency tribune in 123 BC. Again starting far coming to social reforms, Gaius succeeded only in establishing a pattern of social welfare system which did not work correctly and effectively bankrupted the state, serving only to stir up the abhorrence of the top classes in a kind not seen even against Tiberius Gracchus.

 

Sulla - De Facto Ruler of Rome

After physically clashing with some of the other armies, General Cornelius Sulla appeared as the strongest foremost and became the de facto leader of Rome. Remarkably sufficient, after inserting a number of reforms (including expanding the powers of the senate) Sulla resigned voluntarily from the affairs of state.

 

Pompey and Caesar Clash

By this time although, two other generals had also appeared, each with their own armies: Pompey and Julius Caesar. Pompey had directed Roman legions far and broad, in Italy, Africa, Spain, and Asia Minor and even as far as the Euphrates River valley. He had also been instrumental in assisting to suppress the famous slave uprising directed by Spartacus in 73 BC.(Hunt, 2001)

 

Caesar's Exploits

Although the most famous of the Romans, Caesar in detail only directed for five years, from 49 BC to 44 BC. He was an outstanding author and orator, and ...