RESEARCH PROBLEM SOLVING ASSIGNMENT

Research Problem solving assignment

Research Problem solving assignment

Introduction

If A suffers damage by the wrongful act of B he must establish that in doing the act B was responsible. If he states that he was C's agent he must farther display that C authorised the act. In Ormrod v. Crosville Motor Services Ltd. [1953] 1 W.L.R. 1 J. If all that had to be shown to establish liability on the part of the proprietor of a vehicle was that he had permitted its use by the individual who was negligent, then Hewittv. Bonvin was wrongly decided. There the child was allowed to use the car and it was held that the dad was not to blame for the son's negligent driving.

The Plan

Here in this case Danny is reponsible for the damage as he was negligent he did not wipe the glass of the car and neither put up any sign showing he is anew driver. (Mullany and Handford 2007 Pp. 14)

Thead covering was a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeal and I cannot reconcile the outlook expressed by Lord Denning M.R. i t. Lord Denning M.R. said [1971] 2 Q.B. 245, 255:

"The individual because of whom the misfortune takes location is responsible for all injury or impairment finished by his permitted person going by car in the negligent going by car of the vehicle; "Most road traffic misfortune compensation engages two person drivings, with a person driving or passenger from the one vehicle seeking reimbursement from the driver of the second vehicle. Based on evidence that the misfortune was initiated through negligence. The street traffic misfortune reimbursement assertion will lead to legal proceedings that will involve the person driving and probably, travellers of both vehicles asserting wound as a result of the negligent driving on one ...