Quantitative Research Questions



Quantitative Research Questions

Introduction

The psychosocial interferences in adolescents' children and their parents who were affected from Diabetes were identified. Type 1 Diabetes is the most rigorous chronic diseases that were found in teenagers members. The health of the members under 20 years in America was found highly effected due to this disease. Two significant tests were been used for analyzing the results of children and their parents in the society. The randomized controlled design was implemented on the selected sample by using the source of Coping Skills Training (CST) and Group Education (GE). These two tests were played a significant role for evaluating the participating factors in the society. The test was conducted among teenagers and their parents. The overall epitome of this research is to identify the short term feasibility and efficacy of CST interference in school going children and parents who were suffering from Diabetes. The theoretical structure of this research study was to evaluate the stress level of these affected patients. The CST model had used to conjecture and progress their family adaptation, psychosocial and psychological level. The overall effect of CST and GE were analyzed, and their major and minor effects on the targeted respondents of America were identified (Cockroft, et.al, 2012).

Discussion

Define internal validity. Is this study strong in internal validity? What, if any, are the threats to internal validity of this study?

The internal validity is a special characteristic in a research study which helps to reflect the degree to which a fundamental conclusion had drawn, and it also identified the study is warranted. The main function of internal validity is to remove the outliers or errors in the data set. Such property is comprised by the degree to which a research study reduces biasness or systematic error in the study. In any research study, the chances of internal validity occur, when the investigator had the capability to control on the errors and reduced the biasness in the systematic results that were obtained after analysis. The irrelevant variables were reduced, and only main variables had manipulated. This describes that the final outcomes had attained by intending the error free variables and reduced the irrelevant and unwanted variables.

In this research study, the internal validity is not sufficiently strong because the investigator was failed to remove all the outliers or biasness that had negatively affected the main results. Two tests were significantly used in this study for evaluating the affected respondents such as adolescents and their parents who were Type 1 Diabetes disease. The Coping Skills Training was insufficient and could not overcome the lacking groups. Due to this process or lacking in strategy, the internal validity of this research study is not adequately robust. The outcomes that the investigator had attained were outliers or systematic errors. This error had enhanced the biasness in the results and negatively affects the main outcomes (Onwuegbuzie & McLean, 2003). However, the investigators were failed to remove all the outliers in the study, due to which they obtained inconsistent ...