PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY

Professional autonomy



Professional autonomy

Introduction

Professional autonomy is rarely de- finite in itself. It is therefore useful to specify the characteristics. The two terms in the expression are from different sources. The first is of an individual nature. Autonomy draws on gasoline even of each individual and the development of person. Faced also with the requirements and influences of society, cultures, about Nantes and work experiences, autonomy is changes throughout life. The second term refers to areas of knowledge and skills acquired during your termination to the practice of a profession. In this case is the relationship with the world of work- Vail coming prescribe limits to the exercise of professional autonomy. According to my personal opinion, I am not a supporter of professional autonomy, which I believe is not only a myth, that is to say a misrepresentation of reality that is maintained by the sheer force of tradition, but also a standard morally reprehensible conduct. My creed, if I have one, is called interdependence professional. These two antagonistic philosophies can coexist peacefully within the same organization. They are natural adversaries (Cherniss, 1980, pp. 32).

Professional autonomy is a myth for two reasons.

First, a professional who works in an organization like the College at once depends on the work and affects the work of his colleagues. For example, motivation and the accumulated knowledge of students depend in large part of their school experience and therefore business decisions made by teachers in the educational upstream. The willingness and ability to learn from college last year are shaped in early childhood by the family and child care, then by the primary and secondary schools, and finally by the college teachers who are young first-and second year.

People live in this reality every day while they are busy to correct some misconceptions and attitudes ruinous, or ...