Principles of Authority and Argumentation in Academic Writing

Principles of Authority and Argumentation in Academic Writing

Introduction

One of the foremost modes of argumentation can be pertained to nearly all assignments relating critical way of thinking no matter the discipline or subject (Edlund, 2010). Since it involves an advanced level of analysis than related with expository writing, narrative writing or descriptive writing as such, it is vital for the successful students of university level to comprehend and become proficient in the principles, certainly the concepts that force the crucial thinking abilities linked with argumentative writing. The three main principles of argumentation are Logos, Ethos and Pathos. Logos refers to the inner uniformity of the message that is the clarity of the assertion (Edlund, 2010), the logic of its basis, and the usefulness of its supporting substantiation. On the other hand, Ethos refers to the credibility of the speaker or writer. Ethos is mostly conveyed by means of style and tone of the message and by means of the way the speaker or writer refers to contradictory views. And Pathos is mostly linked with emotional appeal. However a better correspondent may perhaps be appeal to the imagination and sympathies of the audience (Edlund, 2010). Here in this paper we will discuss the use of Ethos, Logos and Pathos by Jan Otto Andersson in his article “one full, unequal world”.

Discussion

In this article, the author Jan Otto Andersson uses the principles of authority and argumentation. According to him people generally agree that they live in an unequal and imbalanced world (Andersson, 2007). He provides significant data that help readers analyze that if quintile of the world is examined that is the population living in the wealthy countries is compared their to the quintile of the population living in underprivileged countries then the ratios of incomes at market ...