Police Corruption

Police corruption

Introduction

The police crime can be defined as a phenomenon police logic that usually affects surreptitiously at all levels of the police culture in low or high the rank of the police, which includes commissioners and directors general of police or armed forces. The crimes of police have such a wide variety such as exists in the types of the Criminal Code. The police offender as any other citizens, but police crime can be better understood those made ??using the post, media, tools, weapons, documents or information that is available only to men with a badge. There are also police crime defaults, both the duty of care, for the concealment or destruction of evidence that should be contributed to any legal proceedings. A "bad cop" deliberately prevent the judiciary can get to know the truth. In these cases the work of a forensic expert specializing usually transcendental.

There are numerous criteria to classify the type's police corruption and some of the experts on police activities are recognition or realization of informal and formal complaints, conducting valuations, review or audit of police and expert reports, review of police procedures and contrast in field police work. Also the expert is or can be requested to reinforce suspicions, hypotheses or theories police.

The code of silence is the refusal of officers to testify against other officers—is one of the major factors protecting police corruption. Proponents argue the code of silence is integral to police work, due to the high level of danger and unpredictability, the impossible mandate set for police, and the unforgiving and unsupportive nature of the public and police administration. By comparison, opponents argue that the code of silence breeds police secrecy as well as public distrust of the police, diminishing the perceived competency of the criminal justice system. Before these arguments can be assessed, a description of the nature of police corruption, as well as its theories, types, and levels, must be introduced. The triumphs and challenges for preventing and controlling corruption in the modern century are also discussed.

Defining Police Corruption

Police corruption takes place when an officer misuses his or her authority and official capacity to bring about personal gain (Parks, Bernard, 2000).

Police corruption takes place anytime an officer receives advantage or reward for:

Doing something that he or she is required to do under duty anyway;

Doing something that an officer is prohibited from doing on duty;

Exercising police discretion, but for improper reasons; or

Employing illegal or immoral means to achieve police goals.

Discussion

Defining police corruption this way embodies the variety of behaviors typically defined as police corruption and the rewards associated with corruption, which may be personal in nature—including money, gifts, power, and prestige, or organizational rewards such as promotion, approval of administrators, and colleague's support.

Types of Police Corruption

In their book, Police in America (2008), Sam Walker and Charles Katz describe four general types of police corruption: taking gratuities, taking bribes, theft or burglary, and internal corruption. The most common form of police corruption involves gratuities—small tips ...