PHYSICAL EVIDENCE EXCLUSION CASE

Physical Evidence Exclusion Case

Physical Evidence Exclusion Case

Questions

William's lawyer argue

Prosecution in the reconsider process, how to accurately and competently discovered and discovered illegal clues, is the actual handling of the tough problems. We note that in some cases contractors in the reconsider of clues, they often focus only on the clues of the facts of the case to reconsider the relevance and objectivity, while disregarding the legality of the reconsider of the evidence. Although in normal circumstances, so the reconsider can be finished rightly handle the case, but it is a very dangerous tendency.

In latest years, cases of injustice from the incorrect outlook of the causes, most are due to contractors too much trust in the authorities investigating the legality of the transfer of clues, so in with fake or incomplete clues base on the mistake obtained The conclusions, which inevitably directed to cases of injustice incorrect lesson is not anything less than deep. Therefore, to accurately notice and recognise illegal clues, we must first establish in their minds the factual sense of injustice, and to advance the employed methods of the investigation authorities to supply clues of the legitimacy of strict command in alignment to put an end to injustice from the fundamental mistake of cases occurred. In specific work, I believe we can focus on the next aspects: 1, attach importance to the defendant or criminal suspect to listen to excuses as well as the views of victims, from which there may be discovered in the torture or threat, enticement, deceit or other unlawful means forensicsIssue . Once there is clues and should be resolutely amended or excluded.

Difference Between The Evidence Collected From The Ellis And Stevens Homes

 In that case, the casualty sustained serious injuries, showing persistent vegetative state after one year due to medical treatment died. The suspect in a year and a half years, had not been detained. Physical contact in the circumstances of the parties, the original files apparently contradictory testimony of witnesses, and ultimately verified, the casualty former acts of aggression, still in a state against criminal suspects against the casualty for defense purposes. Acts of aggression in the casualty former to the parties if there is physical contact, I marvel if investigators chose not recall, or manage not propose to neglect, witness testimony and confessions of criminal suspects are short, two-person dispute. But also in the identification of conclusions, both in vivo tests and identification, or inspection and identification of the body, are lethal only to the head agency to be recognised, in addition to death at the head outside the body identification of victims in other parts of the publication shows no injuries. In addition to the death of the head, if the Department, no mention of other injuries. From the various anomalies can not assist but raise questions, the case was thus almost Doubtful Case. However, for whatever reason, from the clues that the legality of perspective, one thing is certain, that major criminal cases undertaken by the ...