philosophy

philosophy

Nagel argues that even if each individuals' principles is influenced by their conception of good, they would not be seeking special advantages for themselves so long as he does not know who in the society he is. He perpetuates that the complete impartiality advocated by Rawls does not ensure justice for it overlooks 'the natural position that even in a nonteleological theory what is just must depend on what is considered good.' Nagel suggests that in Rawls' endeavor to achieve unanimity; he overlooks the issue that many conceptions of the good do not fit into the individualistic pattern. Thus individuals may ...