Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Table of Content
Abstract3
Introduction4
Objectives of the Study4
Significance of the Study5
HRM Functions and the Organizational Behavior: Discussion6
Managing People10
The Spherical Firm14
TCG: A Multifirm Spherical Network16
The Human Investment Philosophy19
Assumptions about People: Identifying HR Issue20
Implications for HR Management Policies and Practices21
Expectations24
The Human Investment Model in Action25
Investing in Capabilities and Trust at the Individual Level25
Investing in Capabilities and Trust at the Team Level27
Investing in Capabilities and Trust at the Firm Level28
Investing in Capabilities and Trust at the Network Level29
Conclusion30
References32
Abstract
The study of organizational behavior (OB) and its affiliated subjects helps us understand what people think, feel and do in organizational settings. For managers and, realistically, all employees, this knowledge helps predict, understand and control organizational events. There are three determinants of behavior in order to make an organization more effective: individual, groups, and structure. The people within the organization and their behaviors affect the performance of the organization. There are a number of behavioral disciplines that contribute to OB: psychology, sociology, social psychology, anthropology, and political science. There are lot of challenges and opportunities today for managers to use OB concepts. One of the most important and broad-based challenges facing organizations today is adapting to diverse work environments. Organizations are becoming more heterogeneous in terms of gender, race, and ethnicity. Understanding the concepts of OB allows management to facilitate the needs of a diverse workforce.
Introduction
In its broadest sense, managing people or human resource management is a widely used term coined to encapsulate management policies and practices concerned with the supply and utilization of the labor resource required for the firm to meet its commercial objectives. To do so, the employer has to be able to compete within the labor market and meet basic requirements of social legitimacy relevant to the society in which the firm is located. The employer needs to be able to attract and keep labor and ensure that labor power is utilized for productive purposes relevant to its business objectives (Abernathy, 2000). It is by no means certain how best to proceed in this endeavor. This uncertainty in the context of inevitable resource constraints—whether financial, cognitive, or the capacity for control—make both the meaning and practice of human resource management difficult and ambiguous.
Objectives of the Study
In this article, we discuss organizational behavior and human resource management in the context of a spherically structured firm. Next, we show how such firms can be linked together in a multifirm network and illustrate this arrangement with a look at Technical and Computer Graphics (TCG), a futuristic network organization located in Sydney, Australia. Third, we discuss how the organizational demands of the spherical structure are pushing managers toward a new philosophy of management - a philosophy we call the "human investment model." Finally, we depict the human investment philosophy in action, showing in particular how managers are making investments in competence and trust building at the individual, team, firm, and network levels.
Significance of the Study
The study is significant because organizational behavior is about people at work in all kinds of ...