No single justification for punishment predominates in current sentencing policy

'No single cause for punishment predominates in current sentencing policy'.

Introduction

Numerous theories have been developed that relate to the subject of punishment infliction. These theories usually give inferentially punishing to those persons who have performed wrong something. Four primary justifications for the criminal punishment are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation. In order to answer the above statement, let us considered this understanding individually and determine that how they are relates to each other in Criminal Justice Act 2003. This paper will examine the central arguments that are related to punishment. This paper also illustrates that way in which those arguments related to the justice system and examine how the system would be affected prevail over another. Discussion

Under the criminal justice act of 2003, the primary purpose of sentencing person is to imprisonment for the very first time, in order to reducing crime. Offenders may be punished, rehabilitation and reform; making of reparation and public protection are other primary objectives. One of the most commonly and most cited reason for offender imprisonment is only considered as revenge or punishment. When personal deliberately breaks the law and perform very badly, he or she should deserve to be punished. It is proposed in this action that he or she may suffer equally. In modern time, imprisonment is considered as most severe punishment; therefore person should punish for his or her bad performance.

There is no denying that harsh truth that millions of people have been imprisoned on the basis of this wrapped ideology. If 'eye for an eye' is considered as simplest term than it means murdered should be a murderer and rapist, raped. Now Europeans union has made official policy to actively promote the abolition of the death punishment all around the world. A difficulty occurs in older Acts that how badly person must serve to revive the imprisonment from a part of 'eye for an eye' situation. Situation would become worst when harm caused by the crime spiralled comes into adult situation because the distinction between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour would be blurred.

It is necessary under the name of justice that condemnatory aspect about any punishment should be suit crime that should be trusty worth of reprobation. It is essential for all prison that reason should works towards a positive regime where prisoner's treatment is not compromised. It is become diseased circumstances that the public is fundamentally remained ill informed about the prison alternatives. In the current situation, policy makers propose and illustrate the useful alternatives of prison. The option should regularly collect the great support from publics. More fundamentally, sentencing dissuaded from utilizing the alternative penalties because an assumption is that the public would disproved it. Retribution

In ancient reason for the punishment of criminals, Retribution is considered as our society has its own Old Testament law that dictates that the offender should be punished in an equalized method. There is no rule to create any difference in punishment of crime that ...