The purpose of ban smoking in North California is to protect those people who want to smoke and those who do not want other people smoke in front of them (Goldstein & Sobel, 1998). Some opponents would worry about when North California enacted a ban on smoking at bars and restaurants. Their primary concern was to that they may loose healthy customers for their business because wealthy clients on these areas mostly prefer smoking and drinking. This paper discuss the central review find out why North California not outlaw banned from smoking, and what long term consequence of such type of banned that California state may face in the future.
Discussion
Study indicates that which was happen in more than 9 states of Unites States including North California, study found that smoke free law not have a negative impact on the aggregate bars and restaurant revenue or employment of bars (Stave & Jackson, 1991).
Another study indicates that Public health advocates knew that prohibiting of smoking in restaurants and bars would directly improve customer health and employees through eliminating their exposure and the second hand smoking. The strength of the study indicates there is no charge on economic policy in order to apply this order (Stave & Jackson, 1991).
Researchers also indicate that usage of smoke-less products such as snus or snuff, in a smoke free bars and restaurants. Manufacturers of tobacco admired those smokeless products availability is a way for adults to enjoy smoking free environment. Advocates of anti-tobacco also reveals that through allowing he use of smokeless products in the restaurant and bars change smokers habit and create an incentive to quit smoking. In addition, local bars and restaurant operations manager said that smoking has been positive, but thee are ...