MONITOR MODEL

Critical evaluation of Krashen's Monitor Model: (SLA Research and

Approaches to language teaching)

Critical evaluation of Krashen's Monitor Model: (SLA Research and

Approaches to language teaching)



Introduction

It is a widely accepted fact that in order to learn a language, one must receive the necessary data. This data of the language that the learner gets exposed to through any medium such as listening, reading, or gestures in the case of sign languages (Gass & Mackey, 2006). In acquiring their first language, children receive a large quantity of L1 data from their parents and the surrounding environment. In learning a foreign language, the majority of the learners receive the L2 data from language classes. This data got provided to them through two main sources of input: the teacher and the textbook.

However, Krashen came in the limelight as he got known for having published over 450 papers and books. Moreover, Dr. Krashen has actively contributed to the fields of second language acquisition, bilingual education, and reading. Krashen has introduced various influential concepts and terms in the study of second Language acquisition, theories about language acquisition, and reading theory. He believes in self-selected reading is one of the most powerful tools available in academic success today. Dr. krashen got awarded with many honors, including the distinguished Presentation related to School Library Media Centers Award in 1993 and got elected to the Reading Hall of Fame in 2OO5. He was the 1977 Bench Press champion or Venice Beach and holds a black belt in Tae Kwon Do.

However, there is a long-held debate among applied linguists, as well as practicing teachers, got concerned with what input is optimal for learning a foreign language. Should learners be exposed to righteous materials or simplified ones? If simplification works, how should it be brought into implementation? These are the controversial issues that are still unresolved. While a number of studies have shown that modified input facilitates comprehension (Oh, 2001), there is still ongoing debate as to what modification is desirable. There are two important positions which ought to be examined in this respect. The first is Krashen's Input Hypothesis in the years 1981, 1982, 1985, which maintains that comprehension gets facilitated through simplification of input, and the other is Long's interaction hypothesis, which argues for superiority of interactional modifications to simplification of input (Gass, & Mackey, 2006).

Discussion

Theories of second language acquisition (ASL) investigate the processes by which a second language comes to be learned. There is great diversity of theoretical approaches to the ASL, but we will limit those who have been most relevant and important to present concepts ELAO. Moreover, according to Krashen, learners can benefit from three sources of contextual information to make sense of the incoming input. These contextual clues are extra-linguistic information (pictures, and visuals). The learner's knowledge of the world and the learner's previously gained linguistic competence. Thus, for example, it is possible for a learner who does not know the passive structure to make sense of the sentence John got robbed of his ...