b. Difference of Profitability in different Costing Systems
By studying the above calculations, the difference in the per unit cost can clearly be seen due to which, the profitability will also differ. This difference is due to basis of allocation of traceable cost, the traditional style has used the machine hour method, while all traceable cost are not related to machine hour but with other factors such as machine set ups, no of shipments, etc (Sharman, 1993, 17-22). Therefore, the allocation of traceable cost is different and more realistic in Activity Based Costing rather than traditional costing method.
c. Comments and Recommendations
The findings of the Activity Based costing is opposite as compared to the traditional costing. The existing costing shows the Regal series more profitable than the Monarch series; while in Activity Based costing the Monarch, series is profitable far wide than Regal series.
i. Costing through Existing System
Monarch
Regal
Selling price
900
1140
Cost to manufacture
570
798
Selling and admin
265
244.5
Operating profit per unit.
65
97.5
ii. Costing through Activity Based System
Monarch
Regal
Selling price
900
1140
Cost to manufacture
514
1108
Selling and admin
265
244.5
Operating profit per unit.
121
-212.5
This shows that the newly introduced Regal series is not profitable and is below the breakeven point. The company should concentrate on Monarch as it is showing more profit than Regal as per Activity Based Costing. However, in traditional method the Regal seems more profitable. The ABC costing is more realistic as it considers each and every production factor in determining cost per unit, therefore the decision should be based on it and the Monarch should be concentrated. However, we can also observe the costly Regal series and ponder on the production activities to minimize cost where possible, which will decrease the overall cost and increase the profitability in future.
d. Benefits, Costs and Limitations of ABC Costing
Over the past two decades, Activity-Based Cost has grown from an obscure almost novelty costing methodology to a commonly accepted cost management methodology. One evidence of this is the plethora of supposedly new variations. Most of these variations result from marketing efforts to distinguish one software or consulting provider from the pack. Yet, the common problem of any company striving to improve its profitability through better cost management is not the particular variant but failing to adhere to basic underlying principles of good Cost Management (Cokins, 1996, 15-25).
ABC allows defining the activity during which each element of cost is incurred. You may configure costs to be fixed per batch, or based on the quantity being handled. You can recover pre-production costs such as buying, expediting and goods-in, as items are received into stock from purchase orders. You can recover manufacturing costs at the time of receipt into stock of goods from Work in Progress. The recovery of these ABC overhead costs may be over-and-above the overheads recovered using traditional ...