LEGALIZING MARIJUANA

Legalizing Marijuana

Legalizing Marijuana

Today, pharmaceuticals are a foremost anxiety and topic for Americans for diverse reasons. We hear tales every day about drug-related misdeeds, but the "war on pharmaceuticals" has been going on for years, and it is conspicuously failing. Drug laws have only initiated more violence and crime. They have also failed to reduce the demand for drugs. Drug laws have been very rough on people that are put in prison for ownership of marijuana charges. The decriminalization of marijuana can advantage humanity through health advantages and by decreasing the allowance of cash expended on drug enforcement. Furthermore, a foremost cause marijuana is not legalized is the numerous myths about the sick consequences of marijuana.

A nearer investigation of the DEA's government arranging scheme reveals that, according to diverse investigations by physicians on both edges of the legalization argument, marijuana does not rendezvous the obligations of an agenda I pharmaceutical, but not those of agenda II. The difference between the two categories is that agenda I pharmaceuticals may lead to death, while those on Schedule II are less expected to do so. Proponents of legalization cite information that shows marijuana is a somewhat protected" drug. "There is no renowned case of overdose; on the basis of animal forms, the ratio of lethal to productive dose is 40,000 to 1" (Grinspoon, 1995). Even some adversaries of marijuana legalization support reclassification. Two physicians, in a widely circulated attitudes piece deserving "Marijuana Smoking as surgery: A fiendish Hoax", wrote; "While the reclassification of THC to agenda II might be understandable, this would not be the result of smoking the crude pharmaceutical marijuana, which would as a outcome become more available and more gladly redirected for non-medical use" (Nahas, 2005). Although this evidence apparently does not support the legalization of marijuana, it best features one of numerous discrepancies that cloud this smoky debate.

Lester Grinspoon, MD, is a proponent of the health legalization and re-classification of marijuana. In the periodical of the American health Association, Dr. Grinspoon composed an item deserving "A Plea for Reconsideration". In this plea, Grinspoon suggests that marijuana should be reclassified to a Schedule II class pharmaceutical, so that it might be lawfully prescribed. He writes:

In a 1990 review, 44% of oncologists said they had proposed that a patient fumes marihuana for respite of the nausea induced by chemotherapy. If marihuana were really unsafe for use under health supervision, as its Schedule I rank specifically affirms, this recommendation would be unthinkable. It is time for physicians to accept more in an open way that this present classification is scientifically, lawfully, and ethically wrong. ((Inciardi & Duane, 1991, 45-79)

The use of marijuana in the health area can help numerous persons in numerous ways. Marijuana has assisted many cancerous hazardous disease patients deal with the side consequences of chemotherapy. These edge consequences include nausea and vomiting. Tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC (the chemical in marijuana that makes people "high"), decreases this vomiting and nausea, putting the patient at ...