LEGALIZING MARIJUANA

Legalizing Marijuana

Legalizing Marijuana

Introduction

Drugs are a major influential force in our homeland today. The problem has gotten so out of hand that many choices are being advised to control it or even solve it. Ending the pharmaceutical war seems to be impossible. The conflict on pharmaceuticals appears to be accomplishing a lot but this is not true. Different choices need to be considered. Legalization is an choice that hasn't gotten a chance but should be granted one. Although many persons feel that legalizing marijuana would boost the amount of use, marijuana should be legalized because it will decrease the large allowances of money expended on enforcement, and it will boost our country's revenue. There are also numerous advantages that can be uncovered to help persons if legalization of marijuana is granted a chance.

Analysis

Legalizing marijuana would boost our economy's revenue. During Prohibition alcohol use was still traded and used, but persons were doing it illegally. The 21st amendment repealed prohibition and alcohol taxes were increased. The identical thing should happen with marijuana. Marijuana should be levied heavily to boost our revenue. Marijuana would be made by the same people who make aspirin so the quality would be assured, containing no poisons or adulterants (Barbers et al, 1997).

Making marijuana legal will reduce the great amounts of money spent on enforcement every year. Drug dealers and users are one step ahead on the enforcement process. If one pharmaceutical lord is caught, another one will show up somewhere else. (Marijuana Legalization Organization 3) We cannot win. "In 1997, 10 billion dollars were expended alone just on enforcing pharmaceutical laws. Drugs accounted for about 40 per hundred of all felony indictments in the New York town enclosures in 1989. This figure is quadruple what it was in 1985. Forty per hundred of the persons in federal prison are drug regulation violators. One can only envisage what this number would be like today. Too much money is wasted on a cause that seems to have no end in sight. All of this money could be used on better things (Barbers et al, 1997).

Since the 1970s, more than a dozen government-appointed charges have examined the consequences of marijuana, and made public principle recommendations considering its use. Overwhelmingly, the conclusions of these professional panels have been the identical: marijuana prohibition determinants more communal damage than marijuana use, and the possession of marijuana for individual ...