LAW AND POLITICS: COMAPRISION

Law and Politics: Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx Comparison



Law and Politics

Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx Comparison

Law and the State

In the idea of origin of state, the nature of government, and the privileges of guideline can be drawn as the reflection of insightful beliefs of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Karl Marx. Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto shows yearn to construct "humanity without financial classes". John Locke's Political idea assertions the establishment of natural rights which will aid dispute against unjust rulers. Thomas Hobbes's most well known publication, the "Leviathan" characterises a government which unifies the collective will of numerous individual and unites them under the administration of sovereign power. Although the three philosophers yearn the identical result through their ideas, its practices and use have demonstrated that there are distinction and likenesses both present. All are saying that there should be unconditional government, but their localities of specialization are different.

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are pre-Enlightenment thinkers, however, their ideologies influence the next period of the Enlightenment, also known as the "Age of Reason.

Karl Marx and Thomas Hobbes both agreed on the theory of collectivism over individualism. Marx is more quantitative and calculative in his reasoning, while Hobbes's theories are based on natural laws. The contradiction between Marx's and Hobbes's notions of material wealth is that modern humanity outlook men to compete with each other for material items and that is just. Humans do not reside in isolation but work to achieve together a humanity that turns a unseeing eye to what is alienating man from his environment" (Marx). On the other hand, Hobbes argued that "Rights of liberty, house can be moved from one individual to another by means of lawful contract. Human beings are routinely self-centred, thus they are always ...