The main dilemma regarding the product liability case involving a suburban homeowner, Peters; is in reference to the injury caused to the individual due to the lack of product information provided by the manufacturing company. As a purchaser Peters has several rights, which have to be complied and satisfied by the relevant product manufacturing companies. As Peters is not a professional builder or heavy machine operator, he is dependent on the warnings and the instructions provided by the product manufacturing companies. In this case Peters has been physically harmed by the use of the concrete cutter that he purchased from ...