LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW

LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW



LANDLORD AND TENANT LAW

Case 1

Referring to the scenario Mr. Razor should get all work done by Mr. Shabby as it's his responsibility to provide the premises without any defects. The first point concerns the responsibility of Mr. Shabby's contract for the repair, it's important to note that” tenant covenants shall keep premises in a good status for all fetuses." Under this agreement the word "correction" Note that some "conditions" (Garner and Frith, 2008) are different. By contrast, a thing may be functionally effective, yet be in disrepair. In Sheldon v West Bromwich Corp (1973) 17 HLR 23, a corroded water tank was in disrepair although not actually leaking. Similarly, in Re Mayor and Corporation of London [1910] 2 Ch. 314, the rusty and weakened girders supporting the Smithfield meat market structure were is disrepair even though they remained capable of supporting the market structure.

Where some disrepair has occurred which requires repair, the replacement of some parts of the building, as yet undamaged, may qualify as repairs if future damage is likely. See Ravenseft Properties v Davestone (Holdings) Ltd [1980] QB 12 (complete replacement of stone cladding around a building was all repair even though only some of the cladding had fallen off since future disrepair was, on the facts, likely and it was reasonable to do all the work at the same time). In McDougall v Easington DC (1989) 21 HLR 596, measures taken not only to repair damage to a leaking roof, but also measures to prevent similar occurrences were all held to be repairs.

Welsh v Greenwich LBC (2001) 33 HLR 40, CA. In this case, the Supreme Court a house in good condition and repair the responsibility of local authorities, "the usually the word" repair would fall "over the by the use of an independent responsibility to be decided in (Willkie, & Cole, 2006). This particular case, in accordance with local authority tenants condensation damage liability for the losses suffered by. Another problem in this case, the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (Thompson, 2006), s contract stipulated. This part of the agreements is a basic requirement of the law (Garner and Frith, 2008) is even said that they set up in the face. This section of the law to keep a tenant of a house means that the structure and exterior repairs. Repair contracts to a careful analysis is required to have the dimensions of repair work may determine. For example, to keep an agreement to protect tenants in good condition and in a position to put the "expensive". Moreover, the fact that repairs may include removing the contaminated soil land restoration is doubtful. Brothers Limited V Cast Snax (Ross) Limited (1970) for 212EG281. The judge proposed an approach with the rehabilitation, the lease with the state to look back into history to see the exact conditions, particularly in finding that the building, "said the owner tried to a reasonable interpretation of these words and then to rent on this ...