LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954

Landlord and Tenant Act 1954

[Name of the institute]Landlord and Tenant Act 1954

Introduction

The United Kingdom during the eighteenth century made immense working on categorizing property parameters, intellectual property rights protections have been consistently expanding. On the contrary, full monopolistic rights over the publication and distribution of various works of art and literature were granted by the monarchy. This was the reason the Statute of Ann was created as a way to restrict these rights and allow artistic works to pass into the public domain. However, the restrictions which were put in place by the Statute of Anne in the UK have been under constant attack by various rights holders seeking to strengthen the protection of their intellectual property rights. According to Burrows (2011, pp.1-89), one of the strongest justifications given for this strengthening of intellectual property rights is the correlation with increased innovation. The reason for this is that strong intellectual property rights protections are needed to ensure that large-scale innovators will profit from their investment (Holt, 2011).

Discussion and Analysis

The property law in this scenario states that there are personal property rights of the owner. The tenant improved the property and according to the UK law there are different types of rights in the property law it states that the landlord has more authority than the tenants. Tenants are liable to pay the rent of the house however their expanses in the house are uncountable. The case depicted that the tenants has sender his money on the house and the tenant should get the amount However the compensation payable shall be in complementary and payable in accordance with the list of requirements of the Act 1954, that is, double the rental value. The 8% of the property expanse is of the tenants however in the United Kingdom law the owner should pay the compensable amount to the tenants.

However the intellectual property is the property of the owner and it depends upon the owner that they should pay the amount to he tenants. However it is not necessary that the owner should pay the amount o the tenants. The owner of the property has the right to claim for the expanses that the tenants have spent. However the owner has the rights for their land and property and the tenants should ask first the owner before spend their money on the house. Moreover the laws of the United Kingdom states that the compensation regarding the money spend by the tenants should be given o the tenant for spending the amount upon the property. The case of the tenants should b placed in the case law as in the case law there are less constraints (Hughes, 2012).

In case of Unit 2 when the tenant is not in occupation and is paying the rent due late, the landlord should find the terms of lease to an end through harmonious re-entry. If the terms of lease permit for the said occurrence, on the other hand, the rent is late ...