INTER-ORGANISATIONAL DATASET

Inter-organisational Dataset

Inter-organisational Dataset

Introduction: Organizing for Innovation

Innovation, and more in exact technological breakthrough, has long been acknowledged as crucial for the long time span survival and development of the firm; at the equal time technological breakthrough is one of the critical going by vehicle forces to boost communal welfare, in supplement to its direct leverage on economic production. The complexities that begin when conceiving and applying a breakthrough design are precisely affiliated to the multitude of objectives such a design should encompass.

In this esteem applicable insights have been complicated and advised by Van de Ven et a1. The notions of incremental versus basic breakthrough, breakthrough as relentless enhancement by finding out by organising versus breakthrough as creative decimation, flexibility to contain breakthrough alternatives open versus firm pledge to well-defined breakthrough pathways, divergent versus convergent demeanour, exploitation versus enquiry or path creation versus path dependence, are at the centre of the dualities being outlined. Whereas exploitation mentions to undertakings for demonstration enhancement, refinement, effectiveness, assortment and implementation, enquiry is best apprehended by notions like request, kind, experimentation and innovation (March, 1991, p.102).

Hence, associations searching to complete this very, very broad spectrum of breakthrough undertakings are faced with multiple, often at odds, assertions undertaking them with the argument of reconciling paradoxical obligations (Benner & Tushman; 2003; Dougherty, 1996; Leonard-Barton, 1992; Roussel et aI., 1991; Wheelwright & Clark, 1992). Recently, some scholars have complicated the notions of semi- or quasi-autonomous organisations (Brown and Eisenhardt, 1997; Schoonhoven and lellinek, 1990) and ambidextrous associations (Benner and Tushman, 2003; Tushman et aI., 1997) to handle the paradoxical obligations encountered. Within those configurations, inconsistent constituents can co-exist by taking up organizational notions that allow for differentiating explorative undertakings from their mainstream exploitation- oriented counterparts; an theme expressly addressed by authors like Cooper and Kleinschmidt (1995), Cooper and Edgett (1999), and Christensen and Overdorf (2000).

As a conclusion, breakthrough designs entail the deployment of organizational arrangements of a heterogeneous natural environment, whereby balancing the breakthrough efforts between distinct apartments over time becomes a crucial topic of managerial vigilance (Van Looy, Debackere, Bouwen, 2003). Within the work of some of the authors cited, inter-organizational collaborative arrangements are complicated as highly applicable for contemplating with the aforementioned tensions. For demonstration, Brown and Eisenhardt (1997) pointed to the relevance of strategic alliances for seeking into the future and thus to swamp the tension affiliated to combining short time span, often improvement-oriented, and long time span, often breakthrough-oriented, developments. Christensen and Overdorf (2000) support the notion of complementing 'traditional' organizational practices, with conceiving new organizational organisations, spinouts and acquisitions to complete the enquiry oriented objectives of an breakthrough strategy. With this aid, we yearn to investigate if more distant empirical signs can be found out for the supportive function of inter-organizational collaboration in contemplating with the breakthrough paradoxes advised in the preceding paragraphs. Stated additional, are businesses that set up a multitude - or portfolio - of inter-organizational collaborations interior the structure of their breakthrough design, better proficient to ...