How does a person live a meaningful life?



How does a person live a meaningful life?

Introduction

The overall determinants of a life's value and its meaning as an artwork are analogously fundamental for an individual's life. In determining both the meaning of life and value of life by the parts, in their configuration and in their particularity, not only this, but also respectively, the overall subjective contribution of an individual's life to its meaning and to its artwork is necessary to live a life in a better way. Thus, an individual and his overall life are inextricably connected in a way that an artwork and an observer are not linked (J. Benson & al, 2001). We all should learn the caution from this fact that to fiddle with the configuration and parts of an artwork will most probably destroy its meaning and value and then apply that to the individual's life, and not only this but fully value the subjectivity and particularity of the assessment involved. We should avoid all but the concept of universal prescriptions for a meaningful and worthy life of an individual is just as we would act so in the glass-case of a good artwork.

Discussion

A Life and an Artwork

There is an illuminating and close analogy that can be drawn between these two things of what makes a meaningful and a work of valuable art, and what makes a life meaningful and valuable. The vitals rationale here is not to depict that how a life is like a piece of art, but to utilize the ways by which we comprehend an artwork for better understanding about what a life basically is. A point to be noted here is about life, not life in common as meaningful and worthy. Certainly, here the art of an argument is about the latter that make no any sense, and worth can and must only be linked to the life same as it is for a person. The basic analogy may be taken from the value and meaning of a life or an artwork may be determined by the configuration, and the particularity of its elements along with the sensibility of the artwork's observer respectively, and obviously the main character of the individual whose life it is. This thing suggests two things generally. First thing is to expect that there is some universal idea or concept about what meaningful and valuable, a better, life is, just same as it could be in a case of artwork. Second thing is, that we interfere with the components and configuration of a person's life in an acute danger of destroying its entire meaning and value of an individual to whom life is about just the same as we are probably to devastate the meaning and value of an artwork for what we should fiddle or play with its configuration and its overall parts. Whether the interfering is well meaning or not it totally makes any difference (Kant, 1991).

Indeed. It is not a genuine thought ...