It is a detail that no genuine, conclusive verifications for the reality or the non-existence of God exist. Another detail is that numerous reasonable and bright persons are theists (believe in a certain God); and numerous other ones - reasonable and bright as well are atheists (Hancock, Sweetman, Feezell, 1998).
Discussion
This blend of details directs me to believe that contemplating clues for the reality or non-existence of God is not inevitably the cause for taking up atheism or theism (or any other stance). God has a reason for man, but couple of grab what it is knowing that transcendent reason, and actually believing it, can infuse significance into our lives (Hancock, Sweetman, Feezell, 1998). But we can realise our reason only if we search responses from the One who conceived life.
Let us first address the significance of life if evolution were factual and if there were no Creator God who has had any engagement with mankind.
If there were no God, there would be no likelihood of life after the serious and absolutely no likelihood of immortality. Life would end in the finality of the grave. There would be no transcendent reason to give significance to our lives. Our inhabits would have nothing less implication than any animal or bug damaging for survival until the instant of death. All the achievements, the forfeitures, the good and magnificent things men and women do would finally be futile efforts in a cosmos awaiting its own ruin.
A widespread cause utilised to contend that the reality of a god is applicable to us is that a god is essential to have reason or significance in life. Indeed, it is widespread to discover Christians claim that atheists will not probably have any sort of significance or reason to their inhabits without the Christian god. But ...