Tourism is an important agent of change, whereas the global change impacts of tourism patterns and experiences in terms of economic prosperity. These vertical relations in tourism development are mutually connected in a changing world, crises and problems that occur on a global and very local level.
Diagonal - A cross-cultural differences manifest themselves in different historical origins of tourism, currently living world's tourists, in the sense of identity and representation in the formation of new hybrid cultural articulation and trans-generational change in the prospects of tourism entrepreneurs and politicians. Studying the history of tourism has changed primarily Western perspectives of multicultural interpretations of historians, tourism and historians in their own right.
Horizontal linkages of tourism evolution in the rest of domestic tourism cross border and international tourism may coincide in the same social, spatial, cultural, economic and political conditions. As a multicultural society developed, human settlements provide many related uses of recreation and tourist functions, sometimes contradictory, sometimes working well together. Clashes arise between stakeholders in tourism development, which have different historical and cultural values, and new mixes of values and orientations also occur in the networks of stakeholders from different backgrounds. The aim of this paper is to explain the relationship of economy with tourism heritage in the light of theories to explain this phenomenon.
Discussion
Institutional and structural forms of control, critical scholars see tourism as playing a significant role in the imperial game: post-colonial tourist looks with nostalgia (perhaps unconsciously) commodifies local indigenous people as objects to be enjoyed and photographed. However, this is only part of a fairy tale. Other theoretical ideas suggest that even at these very unequal power relations and development, post-colonial subjects are not thrown into total obedience - they can engage in some friendly form of resistance. Nor is their resistance to control and submission simply taken to combat the problem in the form of opposition tactics of domination and power top.
For example, Kaup and Mugerauer (2005) note that Glissant and Chamoiseau (two theorists of creolization and the Caribbean), the outline mode of resistance, which is in between that of colonizer and colonized, so that non-Western other opaque: Its Mode of speaking, morality and its existence is that of always becoming other, generated by the differences that occur through minor changes in language and in a mixed environment of the Caribbean Sea (Franklin, 2003, p. 734).
In the Caribbean, seems to be two symbiotic universe: traditional tropical paradise, whose images are fixed by the homogenization of globalization of international tourism, and the fluid of these places, which are always a minority, always moving toward keeping alive the dynamic difference.4 This dynamic interaction between micro-and local language, and macro-social and global, in our opinion, best captured in an integrated approach to heritage tourism research. Critical regional / global macro research may reveal a stratified system of the dominant economic capitalist system, tourism, micro-study at the local level can reveal language dynamisms in the ...