Need for Developing Interdisciplinary Mix of Outlook to Understand Heritage of Population
Need for Developing Interdisciplinary Mix of Outlook to Understand Heritage of Population
Shifting paradigms of tourism and globalization, restless population, and personality conflicts impose on the scientists to better understand the "heritage" and "cultural tourism." Integrated (micro-macro) approach is presented below as an active and promising step towards the development of new research and theoretical paradigms for cultural tourism. Solution of theoretical developments in sociological treatment of tourism, Dann (2000) points to the importance of participation in a pre-emptive theory and the creation of a viable theoretical agenda: "as a paradigm change constantly, and was disturbed because, as they contain theories should be open for the problem again '(Edensor, 2000, p. 332).
Critically informed approach to heritage tourism research acknowledges that the representations, acts and manifestations of heritage under the influence of network mechanisms, industry and stakeholders. Marketing intermediaries (e.g., tour operators, packers, advertisers) and the culture industry (involved in the production of film, literature, art, music, etc.) play an important role in the production and consumption of culture and cultural heritage goods. Their power structure and form directions, places, people and history of their important players in the international tourism industry focused on capital accumulation and profit.2Yet, most of the 20th century social science is characterized as a micro-level studies (e.g., individual, local) or macro-level analysis (e.g., institutional, social, political, economic and global structures), the theoretical gap between these two has been slow to be taken to other than a few scientists (modern sociologists like Giddens (1990) or geography, as Harvey (1997, 2000 ). I believe that there is an integrative step overdue in theorizing culture, heritage and tourism. A conceptual framework is needed with regard to individual / local (micro level) to the socio-political (macro level) and puts heritage within the local-global scheme of tourism and in physical and ecological systems. Our paper considers the complex and rapidly changing field of heritage and tourism, drawing on a variety of disciplinary perspectives (Kim, 2005, p. 87).
Heritage tourism in the "past" has been the spatial and temporal phenomenon. The is the focus of this tourism type, but identity politics, representation and preservation, which appear in the instrumental use of the past, the influence of physical, social cultural and spiritual well-being and stability of their cultural values, place and conditions work (artificial and natural). Temporality is an important aspect of human experience, and all of the decisions and interpretations necessarily draw on the historicity and context, that is, individual and collective history, education, traditions, customs and cultural Learnings (Hobsbawm, 1983, p. 215). Since the concept of heritage is inextricably linked with the past (historicity), it can be argued that heritage tourism is inextricably about life, existence, identity and change - from past to present and future - it includes a per formative act of appropriation, interpretation and communication aspects of the past through performance, story text, physical sites and material artefacts.
It is these multifaceted dimensions, which makes cultural tourism such ...