It is found that the company named Dreamcatcher is in the process of bargain to reduce its ordering costs with its major supplier from £ 280 to £ 190. For that reason, it is imperative and essential for Dreamcatcher that the effectiveness of market should be analyzed for the ordering costs. The following table shows the probability and demand of the risks that are associated in the case if the crisis persists in the fast recovery, in the medium recovery and in the slow recovery.
Scenario
Probability
Demand
Crisis Continues
20%
40000
Slow Recovery
15%
65000
Medium Recovery
50%
105000
Fast Recovery
15%
250000
Parameter
Value
Parameter
Value
Demand rate(D)
40000
Optimal order quantity
3238
Setup/ Ordering cost
190
Maximum Inventory Level (Imax)
3238
Holding cost
1.45
Average inventory
1619
Unit cost
0
Orders per period(year)
12
Annual Setup cost
2347
Annual Holding cost
2347
Unit costs (PD)
0
Total Cost
4695
It is found from the above table that when the demand is 40000 units, the order cost is £ 190 and Holding cost £ 1.45 then the Dreamcatcher should order 12.35 per year in order to reach the equilibrium level of output where the demand becomes equivalent to the supply, will save the extra cost of the Dreamcatcher on holding the inventory; if they demand 40000 units in the year, the total cost will be £ 4694.68.
Parameter
Value
Parameter
Value
Demand rate (D)
65000
Optimal order quantity
4127
Setup/ Ordering cost (S)
190
Maximum Inventory Level (Imax)
4127
Holding cost (H)
1.45
Average inventory
2064
Unit cost
0
Orders per period(year)
16
Annual Setup cost
2992
Annual Holding cost
2992
Unit costs (PD)
0
Total Cost
5985
From the above table which is based on the slow recovery scenario, it is found that the order cost is £190 and Holding cost (H) £1.45 when the demand is 65000 units, therefore, the company should order 15.75 each year to attain the equilibrium level of output where the demand becomes equivalent to the supply, which will help Dreamcatcher in saving the extra cost to firm for keeping the inventory. In addition to this, if their demand is 65,000 units in the year then the total cost will be to £ 5985.
Parameter
Value
Parameter
Value
Demand rate (D)
105000
Optimal order quantity (Q*)
5246
Setup/ Ordering cost (S)
190
Maximum Inventory Level (Imax)
5246
Holding cost (H)
1.45
Average inventory
2623
Unit cost
0
Orders per period(year)
20
Annual Setup cost
3803
Annual Holding cost
3803
Unit costs (PD)
0
Total Cost
7606
From the above table which is based on the medium recovery scenario, it is found that the order cost is £190 and Holding cost (H) £1.45 when the demand is of Dreamcatcher is 105000 units, thus, the Dreamcatcher should order 20.02 each year to attain the equilibrium level of output where the demand becomes equivalent to the supply, which will help Dreamcatcher in saving the extra cost to firm for keeping the inventory, if the demand of company is 105,000 unit in the year then the total cost will be £ 7606.
Parameter
Value
Parameter
Value
Demand rate (D)
250000
Optimal order quantity (Q*)
8094
Setup/ Ordering cost (S)
190
Maximum Inventory Level (Imax)
8094
Holding cost (H)
1.45
Average inventory
4047
Unit cost
0
Orders per period(year)
31
Annual Setup cost
5868
Annual Holding cost
5868
Unit costs (PD)
0
Total Cost
11737
From the above table which is based on the fast recovery scenario, it is found that the order cost is £190 and Holding cost (H) £1.45 when the demand is of Dreamcatcher is 250000 units, ...