Evidence Based Practice

Evidence Based Practice

Introduction

The Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) initiative is a movement of health professionals who work together to change the practice of prevention, trying to improve it to make it more useful for the health of the population. For this, EBP will enhance the prevention of all interventions for which, in studies based on scientific methods, has been demonstrated the usefulness and effectiveness, and at the same time intends to phase out all those practices of prevention that have demonstrated the futility or ineffectiveness. Since some of the inefficient practices are still required by law, the Evidence-Based Practice Initiative also aims to adapt the current legislation with current scientific knowledge. Relying on the support of the institutes responsible for prevention of epicenter, Evidence-Based Practices for prevention:

Carry out collaborative studies on the effectiveness and costs of interventions to prevent current disease;

Make available documentation on prevention that works;

Organizes meetings, seminars and workshops regularly, and

Organizes training courses for operators of prevention.

The evidence-based nursing forms four general concepts of research, experience of each, expectations or experiences and values ??of each of the users who are served, and available resources, ie each of the research in the context of the institution in which they work (Chiesa, 1999).

Therefore, evidence-based nursing will emerge from the evidence that is of clinical competence that each has in a given area of ??the user's opinion, which is very important, although still used the term patient, the patient requires more and more and more involved in the decision of their care. All this in the particular context of where you work (health, primary, hospital, ICU, pediatrics, etc.).

EBP Situation

This case is one of a personal experince. In this case patient has lung cancer, possibly due to excessive use of tobacco. He was admitted in a hospital for cure and control of lung cancer. He was observed retrospectively to identify possible causal factors, such as his medical and physical condition was compared with patients with and without lung cancer with similar exposure to tobacco.

He was being treated with similar patients having lung cancer. At first, he was isolated from another patients having similar disease. The hospital staff resisted this practice as it was against hospital's norms of treating patients by keeping patients with similar disease at the same place.

Being a Supervisor, a decision was made to shift the patient to another ward with patients not having lung cancer. At first, ...