European Union Law

European Union Law

Introduction

The paper is aimed to resolve the critical situations in the case of Mange Tout restaurant, which is situated in the middle part of London. The case contains number of parties that are required proper recommendations and advices over their decisive positions in the rights of residence. European Union laws are famous for its restrictions and certainty, therefore immigrants and visitors are not permitted to do any illegal practice under the boundary of Europe. The case of Henri holds number of sensitivity as there are so many conducts which are not appropriate in nature. The rights associated with free movement under the premises of UK is typical for these parties because few are living illegal and rest of the others are jumbled about their residence ship. The ECJ case C-68/89 Commission v Netherlands 1991 has cleared the concept that European Union Citizens are not accountable to answer border officials and even for their money. But on other hand, those who have landed from another country or nation are liable to follow firm rules and regulations. This specific case was concerned about European Union citizen, but at contrast, the free movement rights of the non-European Union family member originate directly from their association to the European Union citizen (MRAX, paragraph 74). The ECJ case C-459/99 MRAX v Etat Belge 2002 clearly mentions that there are certain two things for the entrance of the family member which includes; proofs about your identity and their family relationship for instance marriage certificate. The paper will be discussing certain case laws that will fall under the nature of parties and their issues.

Discussion Analysis

The case of Henri's murder and his wife's perceptions about his husband made her perplexed about the decision of separation and permanent residence in U.K or France. Being a consultant I would advise her to first claim for the residence ship on her owns behalf. Under the immigration regulation of 2006, the claim made over the regulations of 23(4) and 27(3) about the Child Benefit that it is important that applicant has to reside in the boundaries of UK. There are certain rights for residing in UK which includes, nationals of United Kingdom, Qualified person, Family member of the qualified individual, employed person, jobseeker, permanent right of residence people, and to those persons who are accepted discretionary and exceptional leave or humanitarian protection. She should be concerned about the EEA National; once it will be approved she can have the right of residence in United Kingdom. This right of residency is developed from European Community law and allows the EEA nationals and their dependants to work and live under the immigration of UK laws. In the matter of Ana, the law falls of the Regulation 10 under the header of “family member who has retained the right of residence”. Paragraph 5 (a) defines that the person is ceased by the member of any specific family of a qualified person, or the national of EEA with a permanent right of residence ...