Ethics Bowl Case Study

Ethics Bowl Case Study

Introduction

The utilitarian doctrine is defined by two elements: the happiness and consequentialism. The utilitarian happiness is the largest component in which every human being investigated. In the utilitarian doctrine that everything is useful, related to the principle of happiness is good and desirable where the name of the doctrine: utilitarianism is a role under the principle of utility. The utility is all that contributes to the happiness of any variant to be rational. The criterion of good and pain is in a balance between the happiness of the individual and the community, everyone is equally adds value. The consequentialism of utilitarianism lies in the fact that an action should be judged for its consequences for the happiness of the greatest number of people (Smart, 2012).

Discussion

For instance, one's happiness principle ceases to be in the moment decreases the happiness of another individual or the largest number of individuals of a society or community. As individual freedom is conceived in respect of the freedom of individuals and the community, my freedom ceases to be when it goes against the freedom of individuals or against the proper functioning of society. We could say that utilitarianism is the continuation of Roman law, and that its modern look is in the fact that the utilitarian doctrine adds a dimension, whether economic, legislative and political to an ethical concept, that of happiness and well-being (Williams, 2011).

It is this perspective, where we analyze the modern component of the doctrine in the ethics bowl case will evolve throughout the nineteenth century. In addition, this gives this doctrine a practical dimension and rational for our modern society, whether in the economic, political and ethical considerations. The theory of utilitarianism greatly relates with the case as Laura needs to access the personal information of the employee concerned so as to ensure that his information do not violate the values of the organization. It goes to show that the aspect of ethics is a highly significant factor in the professional settings as the access to personal information of an employee would present a huge ethical dilemma. The codes of morality as underlined by the concept of utilitarianism clearly state that all actions and decisions must be taken according to the morals. Morals signify that the personal information of an employee is his greatest asset and the organization has no right to access it whatsoever (Chappell, 2009).

Utilitarianism is a philosophical school that was born in the eighteenth century in England. It establishes the practice of actions according to their usefulness for such based on ethical principles. Thus, an attitude should only be implemented if it is for the tranquility of a large number of people. Therefore, before the execution of an action, it must be assessed from the point of view of their practical results.

This expression has been shaped in the first half of the nineteenth century, in reference to the essence of this doctrine. But it was used originally by Stuart ...