Collaborative Efforts between Special and Regular Education Teachers to Enhance Effective Inclusion in the Mainstream Setting
Abstract
Inclusion is a movement that seeks to create schools and other social institutions based on meeting the needs of all learners as well as respecting and learning from each other's differences. Inclusionary schools seek to establish communities of learners by educating all students together in age-appropriate, general education classrooms in their neighborhood schools. Although the inclusion movement has focused on individuals with disabilities, it is designed to alter the philosophy for educating all students (Ferguson, 1996). Although the concept of educating students with disabilities in general education classrooms is not new, its impact on students and educators continues to be examined and debated. This article examines these issues by reviewing the literature with respect to inclusion programs and their impact on students with and without disabilities and on general education (GE) and special education (SE) teachers. Although inclusion also significantly affects families of students with and without disabilities, which would make an interesting parallel to the other issues discussed, we decided not to address inclusion's impact on families because it was beyond the scope of this article.
Table of Contents
Abstract2
Chapter One: Introduction4
Introduction4
Statement of the Problem6
Background and Context for the Problem6
Research Questions/Hypotheses7
Importance or Significance of the Study8
Limitations9
Nature of Study10
Organization Of The Study11
Chapter Two: Literature Review11
Strategies for Advocacy and Compliance14
NCLB and Accountability19
School Improvement, Corrective Action, and Restructuring20
Chapter Three: Methodology39
Data Collection40
Data Analysis40
Participants41
Instruments44
Data Collection Procedures46
Data Analysis Procedures47
Chapter Four: Results, Findings and Discussion50
Results50
Survey: Part II50
The Semi-structured Interview: Perceptions of Co-Teaching54
Discussion56
Implications63
Chapter Five: Conclusion67
References78
Chapter One: Introduction
Introduction
The popularity of the inclusion pattern has been growing since the early 1990s. Inclusion, as it is really defined, mentions to the instruction of all scholars, with and without disabilities, in the general education school room, except substantial evidence is provided to brandish that such a position would not be in the student's best interests (Learning Disabilities Association [LDA], U.S. Department of Education, 2000). In conjunction with this inclination, there has been an increase in the use of collaborative teaching as a pattern of instruction.
Although examiners (Burrello, Lashley, & Beatty, 2001)) have examined the attitudes of general and special educators with esteem to adaptations and interventions used in teaching scholars in heterogeneous school rooms, very twosome of have investigated these teachers' perceptions of collaboration and the concurrent penalties of collaboration on scholar learning. Because effective teaching is a vital constituent of the educational procedure for both scholars without and particularly, with disabilities, it is incumbent upon collaborative teachers to provide quality instruction for all scholars in their classrooms. To double-check that this objective is achieved, these assemblies of teachers should be optimally organised for collaboration. The essential constituents needed to equip collaborative teachers to accomplish this imposing task may be best determined by asking the teachers themselves. This study, an examination of the perceptions of collaborative teachers, provided large information in this endeavor.
Current study points to three types of inclusive teaching: (a) the advisor pattern, in which the special educator assists ...