The two competing programs i.e. THINKIT or SOLVEIT have a functional implication to improve students' creativity. It offer increased confidence in their proficiency to articulate themselves creatively; enthusiasm to accept ambiguity and the doubt of process as part of discovery; openness to options modes of glimpsing a problem, solution, or scenario; and renewed trust in themselves and their promise as creative thinkers (Stone, 1994).
Major concerns related with validity of the findings
In science and statistics, validity has no lone acquiesced delineation but usually mentions to the span to which a notion, conclusion or measurement is well-founded and corresponds unquestionably to the genuine world. The phrase "valid" is drawn from from the Latin validus, significance strong. Validity of a measurement tool (i.e. check in education) is advised to be the degree to which the tool measures what it assertions to measure. In general, Validity is an suggestion of how sound your research is. More expressly, validity concerns to both the conceive and the methods of your research. Validity in data collection entails that your outcome really comprise the occurrence you are asserting to measure. Valid assertions are solid claims.
Validity is one of the major anxieties with research. "Any study can be influenced by distinct types of components which, while extraneous to the anxieties of the study, can invalidate the findings" Controlling all likely components that intimidate the research's validity is a prime blame of every good researcher. Internal Validity is influenced by flaws inside the study itself such as not controlling some of the foremost variables (a conceive problem), or difficulties with the study equipment (a facts and numbers assemblage problem). While, External Validity is the span to which you can generalize your outcome to a bigger assembly or ...