Does rewarding affect motivation in engineering and manufacturing organizations?
By
TABLE OF CONTENTS
METHODOLOGY1
Introduction1
Overview of Research Approach1
Phenomenology2
Research Instruments3
Phenomenological Interviews3
Interview Questions Pertinent to Rewarding System4
Survey Questionnaire4
Questionnaire from Employees5
Questionnaire for Managers6
Role of the Researcher8
Overview Quantitative Research Approach9
Rationale for Employing a Quantitative Study11
Rationale for Employing a Qualitative Study11
Research Method and Design Appropriateness12
Data Analysis12
Quantitative Analysis12
Justification of Research Tools13
Participants of the Study13
Survey Participants13
Interview Participants14
Informed Consent14
Confidentiality15
Validity15
Reliability15
Ethical Concerns16
Timeline17
Limitations of Phenomenological interviews18
Time Constraints18
Sample size19
Honesty of the respondents and Interviewees:19
Conclusion19
REFERENCES20
Questionnaire for Employees24
Questionnaire for Managers28
Interview Questions32
APPENDIX B33
Interview Responses33
Interview 133
Interview 234
Interview 335
Interview 436
Interview 537
APPENDIX C38
Analysis of Survey for Managers47
METHODOLOGY
Introduction
The purpose of this research study is to explore that whether rewarding effects the motivation in engineering and manufacturing organisations. This chapter of the research study furnishes a comprehensive sketch of the design of the research of the research study. In this chapter of the dissertation, the researcher elaborates the different components of the design of the research, particularly, the approach that has been adopted for this particular research. In the determination of the appropriate methodology for conducting this research study a mixed methodology has been adopted. This research study comprises of phenomenological interviews and survey questionnaire that are to be filled by both managers and employees of the engineering and manufacturing organisations.
Overview of Research Approach
In this research study, the dissertation has adopted a mixed approach in order to meet the objectives and aim of this study. The proper formulation of the theoretical framework, real theoretical basis of the study focuses on how we can approach the study from the consultation of a history of how this type has been treated problem in other studies, what type of information is collected, what designs have been used, and so on. For studying such topics like analysing whether rewarding has an effect on the levels of motivation of the employees working in the engineering and manufacturing organisations, the usage of both primary and secondary research method was deemed beneficial.
When conducting quantitative research it refers to empirical data gathering about researched phenomena. This is basically done through a statistical or mathematical method. The primary aim of this type of research is to develop methodical theories that coincide with realistic developments of that phenomenon. The final outcome of such research could be formula, graph, diagrams which could assist to analyze and find out how that phenomenon changes when the time and other variables change. Quantitative research allows making general judgment about similar phenomenon in general.
Phenomenology
The adoption of the phenomenological approach in social sciences an area of open questions and problems that some Researchers expect the beginning of their research - on the method, suspension of a priori theoretical approach, the quality of openness to the phenomenon, descriptive and epistemological issues as well as miscellaneous current from its development (Gray and Lynda, 2002, p. 24).
The formal philosophical framework of descriptive phenomenology is generally credited to Edmund Husserl. Husserl's initial training was among the disciplines of mathematics and science, but his interest turned toward philosophy when these disciplines could not satisfy his search for understanding related to human and ...