This article is about the digital drugs which is normally in use by teenagers in large number, in today's world, according to Mill or drawar and articles, it shows that parents are worried about this new thing, taking as a view of utilitarianism one should have to see is it allowable to all public or not, According to Mill, in particular affirmed that a human being dissatisfied was better than a pig satisfied. The qualitatively higher pleasures are those involving the exercise of distinctive human faculties. He uses the choice of capable people as the criterion of the superior pleasures. If those who are well-known with both pleasures agree that one is better than the other, then that indeed is the higher pleasure.
Mill regards the intellectual pleasures as higher than purely sensory pleasures. This helps to explain the high value that he places on the development of individuality. A person who has individuality would be enjoying the higher pleasures as he or she would be exercising the distinctive human faculties. Those with individuality act autonomously in choosing appropriate ways of life for themselves, rather than simply and unreflectively following custom.
Mill claims that his case for individual liberty rests on utilitarian grounds, although he construes utility in a different sense from Bentham's. What he wants to avoid is not only a defense of liberty as a natural right but also one that relies on Benthamite utilitarianism, appealing to a purely quantitative notion of happiness. It would then be hard to explain why the majority's deep displeasure with the unorthodox and custom-defying conduct of individuals should be discounted, in the way that he obviously wants to. Unlike a Benthamite utilitarian, Mill does not regard liberty as a mere means to happiness, replaceable, where appropriate, by alternative means. ...