DECISION MAKING EXERCISE

Decision making exercise



Decision making exercise

OSHA has handed out their clarification considering citing employers for the use or non-use of blaze retardant or flame-resistant apparel (for the reason of this item the acronym “FRC” will be utilised for both) there are some matters we require to be cognizant of or to reconsider as the enforcement proceeds forward. Let me first state that I outlook this topic very much like I manage the latest wellbeing care restructure bill. I completely support the require for, and use of, FRC in befitting positions just as I support the require for and implementation of wellbeing care reform. However, in both situations we got far more than was required with costly demands that don't inevitably rectify or address the genuine problems. That said, FRC is formally needed by OSHA in every position where the promise for a flash-fire hazard exists. (OSHA Directive CPL 2.87)

In our work it can be presumed that nearly everything between rig up and rig down would have the crew in a possibly dicey flash-fire environment. For most carrying by truck procedures, rig up and rig down would be encompassed as the operators are producing up attachments (and the like), former to beginning the job. The issue I am producing is that, in my attitude, a well overhauling, oilfield carrying by truck or wireline business will be needed by OSHA's benchmark to have the most of their well location workers matched up in FRC for some part of all work presented at the well site.

In actuality, compliance of supplying and needing workers to wear FRC is the simplest part of this standard. You easily purchase the merchandise and need them to wear it at the befitting times throughout a job. What I glimpse as the tough components to obey with, ...