A data set consisting of 100 student records from the flexible delivery MBA programme. The data consists of 100 student records and the following variables:
The student ID number, recorded as 1 to 100 inclusive.
The satisfaction scores relating to administrative, tutor and IT support, labelled as Admin, Tutor and IT respectively. These are scored 1 to 5 inclusive, where 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree and 5 = strongly agree
An assessment of Overall satisfaction, scored as above.
The final average mark obtained by the student on their MBA programme.
The number of hours of private study undertaken by the student.
The number of additional seminars attended, which are provided on a weekend basis to the distance-learning students.
Student gender, where 1 = male and 2 = female.
The sector in which the student is employed, where 1 = manufacturing, 2 = private service sector and 3 = public sector.
If the student would recommend the University and programme to others, where 0 = no, 1 = yes.
Demography of the Data
Gender
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
Male
40
40.0
40.0
40.0
Female
60
60.0
60.0
100.0
Total
100
100.0
100.0
From above pie chart we can observe that major part of our data is consists of females, there is a ratio is 60:40.
Cross Tabulation of Sector and IT
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Missing
Total
N
Percent
N
Percent
N
Percent
Sector * IT
100
100.0%
0
.0%
100
100.0%
Sector * IT Crosstabulation
Count
IT
Total
SD
D
N
A
SA
Sector
manufacturing
0
4
10
11
5
30
private service sector
1
14
11
5
2
33
public sector
2
15
18
2
0
37
Total
3
33
39
18
7
100
As it can be seen the first graph shows a negative skewed distribution. In negative skewed distribution the left tail is longer; the mass of the distribution is concentrated on the right of the figure. It has relatively few low values.
The second graph is right-skewed. In positive distribution, the right tail is longer; the mass of the distribution is concentrated on the left of the figure. It has relatively few high values.
The third graph is symmetric distribution. A skewed (non-symmetric) distribution is a distribution in which there is no such mirror-imaging.
Cross Tabulation of Sector and Tutor
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Missing
Total
N
Percent
N
Percent
N
Percent
Sector * Tutor
100
100.0%
0
.0%
100
100.0%
Sector * Tutor Crosstabulation
Count
Tutor
Total
SD
D
N
A
SA
Sector
manufacturing
3
7
13
7
0
30
private service sector
0
11
12
7
3
33
= public sector
0
6
17
12
2
37
Total
3
24
42
26
5
100
We can observe that a little bit large amount of data is from Public sector but there is not large difference among the three sectors. In Tutor most of the respondents were neutral, agree and disagree.
Comparison Krusal-Wallis test
Ranks
Sector
N
Mean Rank
Admin
manufacturing
30
46.03
private service sector
33
51.20
public sector
37
53.50
Total
100
Tutor
manufacturing
30
44.08
private service sector
33
49.21
public sector
37
56.85
Total
100
IT
manufacturing
30
68.48
private service sector
33
45.89
public sector
37
40.03
Total
100
You should use the output information in the following manner to answer the question.
Step 0 : Check Assumptions
The samples were taken randomly and independently of each other.
The populations have approximately the same shapes (according to the boxplots).
Step 1 : Hypotheses
H0: M1 = M2 = M3 (The median of three groups are equal.)
Ha: Not all of the medians are equal.
Step 2 : Significance Level
a = 0.05
Step 3 : Rejection Region
Reject the null hypothesis if p-value = 0.05.
Step 4 : Test Statistic
Test Statisticsa,b
Admin
Tutor
IT
Chi-Square
1.329
3.696
19.119
df
2
2
2
Asymp. Sig.
.514
.158
.000
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable: Sector
Decision:
Since p value is 0< 0.05 we have to reject null hypothesis and conclude that mean between support services are equal.
Chi-Sq test between overall satisfaction levels in relation to support services satisfaction