Critique Analysis

CRITIQUE OF THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW/META ANAYLSIS PROVIDED

ABSTRACT Systematic review or meta analysis is an essential element that helps in generating effective outcomes. For any kind of research, this method is required in order to generate optimal outcomes without any errors and difficulties. Systematic review / meta analysis is a procedure that gathers relevant data and search accordingly all the pros and cons related to it. After gathering all data, it depicts the positive and negative outcomes accordingly. Main purpose of this review / analysis is to identify the gap and fill it accordingly. This helps in making decisions for any organization or work place. Two main issue are highlighted in this paper in order to analyse and evaluate the outcomes of systematic review and meta analysis. These two tools are equally important and used in order to analyse and identify the main areas that are causing problems. If proper and detailed analysis is done, outcomes can be generated effectively.

INTRODUCTION Systematic review / meta analysis is a detailed procedure that lead towards positive and optimal outcomes. For any outcome, detailed research is essential and carrying out this research is only possible if proper tools are used. Below mentioned are some main areas that should be covered when carrying out a research:1. Introduction & problem2. Evidence related research3. Results4. Discussion5. Conclusion6. Future work These six elements are important and should be highlighted in every research. In an introductory phase, along with the introduction, problem statement should always be highlighted in order to rectify the main problem and where the researcher will work. Evidence based research is a part of detailed analysis where secondary and primary data is used in order to collect relevant information. Results show how people behave and respond to the analysis. It highlights the behaviour and characteristics of people and their preferences. Conclusion summarizes main points, and future work tells how this research can be beneficial and helpful. Two systematic reviews / meta analysis provided are of a different nature and tells how a proper and detailed analysis is conducted in order to generate effective outcomes (Anonymous, 1997). Oral contraceptives and relation with the risk of endometriosis is a major issue that is prevailing in women. Today, every other women face this issue and is unaware of the harmful affects that are related to it. Systematic review and meta analysis is carried on in order to analyse the effects of this issue and how it can be reduced. Oral contraceptives rate is increasing day by day and most of the women are unaware of all the harmful side affects related to it. Systematic review and meta analysis was thus conducted for this reason. Along with this, detailed systematic review and meta analysis was conducted for another main reason. Stress urinary incontinence was another main issue that was increasing day by day. Most of the women were facing this issue and in order to resolve it and identify the actual cause, systematic review and detailed meta analysis was conducted (Begg ...