Critical Evaluation of Occupy Wall Street

Critical Evaluation of Occupy Wall Street

Introduction

Critical evaluation is the progression of assessing the comparative worth of a piece of work. The work might be present in the form of a news article, text book, or even a journal article, and any other format available. In this process a writer is asked to discuss about different facts present inside the article, which includes the discussion of the fact weather the report was good, or bad, the stories reported inside the report are accurate and are based on real data. Does the story represent all the facts, or there were some facts neglected by the author. Where there any sort of assumptions present in the story that are questionable, and are not addressed with an in-depth analysis of the story. Critical evaluation is not about pointing out the faults present in the article, instead it is deciding about the worthwhile and useful the work, arguments, and methodology are, which decides about the fact as to how much this work has contributed to facilitate your, and the worlds understanding regarding the topic. In this research paper the article which we are going to evaluate critically is Occupy Wall Street (Dietz, 2013).

Discussion

Initially the theme of the study revolves around the topical issue, regarding the demonstrations of Occupy Wall Street movement inside the United States of America, in which an aggregate of United States are protesting against the economical and the social in-equality, and the over influential power of corporations over the politicians, and most importantly democracy. The battle is mostly between the lay people, citizens, and lobbyists, who are all involved in criticizing the contemporary status quo, and aver themselves as the have nots vis-à-vis the haves (i.e. government and corporations who possess the wealth). The frequent denominator of this ...