Critical Appraisal of Quantitative Research Evidence

Critical Appraisal of Quantitative Research Evidence

Answers from the Rapid Critical Appraisal

I have selected the peer-reviewed article allied to coping stress in adolescents, diagnosed with diabetes type 1. The title of the article is “An internet coping skills training program for youth with type 1 diabetes,” which is written by Whittemore, Jaser, Jeon, Liberti, Delamater, Murphy, Faulkner and Grey (2012). The answers of the appraisal questions are as followed:

Why was the study done?

This study was done for the evaluation of effective psychological interventions to assist the healthcare providers treating diabetic patients. It is often difficult for adolescents to concentrate on their daily living activities, when diagnosed with certain critical diseases. Such diseases not only influence the physiology of individuals but also affect their quality of life. There are many psychological therapies and interventions for the improvement of quality of life of type I diabetic patients, but possess different outcomes. In accordance of my point of view, this study will make health care professionals as well as adolescent aware of better strategies for coping stress associated to type 1 diabetes.

Are the study findings valid and reliable?

The findings of the study are reliable and valid as the analysts recruited the participants with respect to following factors:

Analysts selected the participants from four different sites giving the comprehension of psychoeducational interventions and capacity of using internet programs

Study covered the high rate of participation across ethnical and racial subgroups

One of the basic strength of evidence is that the researchers were not biased while conducting the study. Research team, participants, clinicians, and investigators selected aligned instruments with conceptual intervening plan and possessed evidence of sufficient validity and reliability in samples of adolescents. Investigators maintained the privacy and confidentiality of participants` information. The study was randomized, and the sample size was ...