CRIME IN SAUDI ARABIA

Crime in Saudi Arabia

Crime in Saudi Arabia

Introduction

Saudi Arabia follows its own state-sponsored version of Sunni Islam, known as Wahhabism, which considered one of the most conservative interpretations of the faith. The government and judicial system based on the Saudi construction of Islamic law, which does not accept the premise that men and women should be treated equally (Rader, 2004). Women are subject to tighter legal restrictions on personal behaviour than are men. Saudi Arabia is a hierarchical society that values obedience, with the younger deferring to the older and women deferring to men in the family. Consequently, the biases built into the laws of the Kingdom and their application reflects the biases in both society and scripture. While the majority of laws discriminate against women, the principle of equivalence believed to sometimes work in women's favour. Women retain ownership of their personal property after marriage and have no obligation to spend their wealth on behalf of their husbands or children (Rader, 2004).

The Reason of Crime in Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia has been a victim of street crime, robbery, theft and sexual harassment because over the last decade people of Saudi Arabia have become frustrated of the current political situation of the country. The people of Saudi Arabia want a simple democratic, system in which the people have the right to select the ruler for them (Forest, 2006).

The number of crimes

Assessing the economic impact of crime has proven to be one of the most quantitatively rigorous areas in the field of criminal studies. Economic damage has been an implicit or explicit motive behind several criminal movements. Osama bin Laden drew lessons from the economic toll inflicted on the Soviet Union during its invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and advised his followers to conduct strikes on Middle Eastern oil facilities in hopes of causing similar economic pain on the energy-reliant Western nations. Based on the logic that violence will reduce an important source of revenue for the target government, many high-profile attacks conducted at popular tourist destinations (Cronin, 2004).

A similar investigation of criminal attacks in Italy determined that a typical strike resulted in a shock to the level of tourism that took a full year to dissipate. Beyond affecting industries, crime appears to have macroeconomic consequences as well, it is interesting that, although criminal acts appear to have only a temporary, and small, negative impact on the gross domestic product of nations, a more significant and positive relationship exists between crime and government spending. While the goal of an act may be to cause economic harm by bleeding a government, an ironic consequence is that governments respond to an attack by investing in counter criminal measures that require materiel and personnel, thus mitigating some of the economic damage caused by the strike (Cronin, 2004).

Why the crimes now is more than before

Crenshaw (2009) was one of the earliest political scientists to conduct research on crime. She concluded that crime was not necessarily the result of broad public dissatisfaction ...