CRANIOCEREBRAL INJURY

Craniocerebral Injury

[Name of Student]

Patterns of accidental craniocerebral injury occurring in early childhood

1.0 OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESES

1.1 Are the objectives of the study clearly stated?

The objective of the study clearly states that the range of the intracranial injuries stumble upon mostly the infants aging around 0-2 years old. This case highlights the injuries causing heavy brain damages and accidental injuries to the inner part of the skull, where intensity of the attacks of trauma occurs at the very most part of the brain. This may lead to clinical consequences leading the patient to suffer from intracranial pressure inside the brain tissue and the cerebrospinal fluid.

2.0 DESIGN

2.1 Is the study design suitable for the objectives?

The study design perfectly highlights all the respective objectives that are appropriate for the study of intracranial injuries which are causing damages to the brain tissues. A review of exposition imaging and the clinical data is been designed for proving with appropriate data. The design outlines a clear clinical consequence according to the given data. The study it perfectly designed for the imaging of clinical data.

2.2 Who/what was studied?

The children who are facing problems with traumatic injuries and intracranial damages to their brain tissues are to be given the knowledge of such consequences. Another study illustrates a clear picture of the craniocerebral trauma caused in children who are facing head injuries. The clinical reports and benign portrays the fatal injuries and their consequences which children in their early age of 0- 2 years mostly face such traumatic injuries to their brain tissues.

2.3 Was this the right sample to answer the objectives?

This could be one of the best samples for answering the objective because the article clearly appraise the clinical consequences faced my most of the infants, who suffer a particular brain damaging trauma in their early age. There are many other samples to prove the clinical consequence because the damage of brain tissues is really common in infants as they have a very weak body structure and have a very sensitive body too. This article can be a good example for relating tit the major objective.

2.4 Is the study large enough to achieve its objectives? Have sample size estimates been performed?

The study is good enough to elaborate the study because it pin points the major causes of intracranial injuries of caused to 149 patients who were suffering from this injury. The objective does covers up a lot from the study unless the sample size is perfectly chosen. The sample size estimates have been performed at its very most level of satisfactory result. A detail report requires many tests and vast majority of cross-sectional imaging findings.

2.5 Were all subjects accounted for?

Almost all of the subjects chosen from the sample population were accounted for this relevant brain injury case. The subjects were chosen on a sample size exclusion criterion where children suffering from cranial CT were chosen for this particular article.

2.6 Were all appropriate outcomes considered?

Almost all of the appropriate outcomes were taken into consideration where the intensity of their damages ...